The fallacy of too wide or broad definition occurs when a term is defined in such a way that it encompasses too much or becomes too vague, leading to confusion or misunderstanding. This can make it difficult to have focused discussions or reach clear conclusions. It is important to ensure that definitions are precise and relevant to the context in which they are being used.
The fallacy of too wide division occurs when someone categorizes a group as having only two extremes with nothing in between. For example, stating that all politicians are either completely honest or completely corrupt, without acknowledging the range of honesty that may exist within that group.
One way to show that a statement is not a good definition is if it is too broad or too narrow, failing to capture the essential characteristics of the term being defined. Another way is if the definition is circular, using the term itself in the explanation. Additionally, if the definition is unclear, vague, or inconsistent, it may not effectively define the term.
Euthyphro shifts his definition of piety from the former to the latter in Plato's dialogue because he realizes that the first definition is too broad and vague, and the second definition suggests a more specific understanding rooted in the gods' approval. By focusing on what the gods love, Euthyphro believes he can provide a more precise and acceptable definition of piety.
Without seeing the thesis sentence, it is difficult to determine if it is too broad, too narrow, or balanced in scope. It is important to ensure that the thesis focuses on a specific aspect of the topic without being overly broad or narrow. Consider revising the thesis to provide a clear direction for the paper.
To determine if your thesis statement is too broad, consider if it covers a specific topic or issue that can be adequately discussed within the scope of your paper. If it encompasses a vast subject area that cannot be effectively analyzed or argued in depth, then it may be too broad. Be sure to clarify your focus and make it more specific if necessary.
The fallacy of too wide division occurs when someone categorizes a group as having only two extremes with nothing in between. For example, stating that all politicians are either completely honest or completely corrupt, without acknowledging the range of honesty that may exist within that group.
because it is too broad and idealistic
The question is much too broad and covers too wide a topic in order to give a generallized answer.
You would have to specify a particular aircraft, "fighter aircraft" is too broad a definition.
Distinct items which do not have wide implication in a given situation is too broad of a question to provide a specific answer. Please be more specific about what situation you are referencing.
Over; more than enough; -- noting excess; as, a thing is too long, too short, or too wide; too high; too many; too much., Likewise; also; in addition.
Your question is too broad to answer. See related link.Your question is too broad to answer. See related link.Your question is too broad to answer. See related link.Your question is too broad to answer. See related link.
One way to show that a statement is not a good definition is if it is too broad or too narrow, failing to capture the essential characteristics of the term being defined. Another way is if the definition is circular, using the term itself in the explanation. Additionally, if the definition is unclear, vague, or inconsistent, it may not effectively define the term.
too broad means that there is a lot of information provided and very general.
too broad
Your question is too broad. You need to visit a law library and do your own research.Your question is too broad. You need to visit a law library and do your own research.Your question is too broad. You need to visit a law library and do your own research.Your question is too broad. You need to visit a law library and do your own research.
Euthyphro shifts his definition of piety from the former to the latter in Plato's dialogue because he realizes that the first definition is too broad and vague, and the second definition suggests a more specific understanding rooted in the gods' approval. By focusing on what the gods love, Euthyphro believes he can provide a more precise and acceptable definition of piety.