Yes, in fact nothing in science is ever considered to be 100% without a doubt factual. Gravity is a prime example in the sense that we're not starting to question if gravity is even real because we can not observe it.
Yes
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Scientific theory.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
If a scientist were being modest, then yes. But a true theory is backed up by scientific data and observation. So your answer is Incorrect.
Intelligent design, Hovind Theory Added: The above are not scientific theories but more ideological assertions in nature. No positive evidence supports either assertion.
yes it can
yes it can prove ....
If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
True.
Briefly, the scientific method essentially involves postulating a theory, and then that theory will either stand or fall on the evidence of future experiments.
Briefly, the scientific method essentially involves postulating a theory, and then that theory will either stand or fall on the evidence of future experiments.
Because technology might change in the future.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
Scientific theory.
Scientific evidence appeal is some form of proof which supports or counters a scientific theory. This is the information that will be used as empirical evidence of a hypothesis.
Scientific evidence is facts or evidence that is used to prove or disprove a scientific theory. Scientific evidence appeal is when new finding or statistics are brought to light that disprove some or all of the previous evidence's findings.