Passed is used to describe motion, eg: I passed by the building. Past is used to describe the passage of time, eg: It was past two o'clock in the morning.
"Past" is used as an adjective, adverb, noun, or preposition to refer to something that has already occurred or to indicate direction or position. "Passed" is the past tense of the verb "pass," meaning to move in a particular direction, to surpass, or to die. Example: "I walked past the bakery" (adverb), "The exam passed without any issues" (verb).
No, the sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to "They were the pranksters."
Yes, "evidenced" is a grammatically correct word. It is the past tense of the verb "evidence," meaning to show or prove something.
The phrase "You are not knowing" is not grammatically correct. Instead, you can use "You do not know" or "You are not aware."
Yes, "forwarded" is a grammatically correct word. It is the past tense of the verb "forward," which means to send something on to a further destination.
The correct phrase is "He walked past," which means he moved beyond a certain point. "He walked pass" is grammatically incorrect.
No, the sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to "They were the pranksters."
Brang isn't grammatically correct. However, it's often used as the simple past of 'bring'.
Set would be grammatically correct.
Yes, "forwarded" is a grammatically correct word. It is the past tense of the verb "forward," which means to send something on to a further destination.
Yes it is
It is grammatically correct, but not good English because things cannot be in despair. Use "desperate."
Both expressions are commonly used and accepted in English, but "the necessity of" is slightly more common and traditional than "the necessity for." Either can be used depending on personal preference or context.
"What I did is" is correct. It does not matter that the doing occurred in the past: it is still what I did, and will always be what I did. The answer below represents a very popular misuse of tenses. You are talking about something you did in the past, because you are using "did", therefore the correct statement is, "What I did was..." If you were to use the verb "is" or "to be" then that means you are speaking about the present, so the correct statement using this verb is "What I am doing is..."
Yes, it is- you can use that as a sentence by itself. "I" is the subject, "am" is the verb, and "done" is the past participle of the verb "do", used in this sentence as a predicate adjective modifying "I".
No. It is grammatically correct to say, "I admire you, greatly."
"Is made" is in the present tense and "was made" is in the past tense. The choice between the two depends on the context of the sentence. Use "is made" when referring to something that currently exists or happens, and "was made" when referring to something that occurred in the past.
To be clear, one's answer should be grammatically correct.