Yes. Creation is a story while evolution is science. The two can really never explain each other. You can not use science to explain any Fairy Tales.
Creationists do think that their story does explain things.
Answer:
No, of course not. As the above answer states, the two cannot explain each other. Science cannot prove that God didn't create the Universe. A significant percentage of scientists believe in God as the creator and the agent of evolution, or without evolution.
Answer:
Just because some scientists believe in god, it doesn't mean that they believe in creation stories. The argument that because they believe in god must mean that they don't believe in evolution is illogical. And a creationist would first have to prove god exists and explain god's origins.
No one has successfully disproved the germ theory of disease, which states that microorganisms can cause infectious diseases. This theory has been supported by a large body of scientific evidence and is widely accepted in the field of microbiology and medicine.
Science generally supports the theory of evolution, which explains the development of life on Earth through natural selection and genetic variation over millions of years. The Big Bang theory is widely accepted among scientists as the most plausible explanation for the origin of the universe.
In creation God created the heavens and the earth. Some people believe in evolution but think about it. Do you believe earth was made because of random disorders or because something bigger than us with power created it?
No. Evolution is accepted as legitimate evidence-supported science by virtually 100% of professional biologists, by 95% of scientists in general, and almost every National or International Academy of Science on the planet has issued one or more statements confirming evolution is legitimate science well supported by all available evidence.
Yes, in fact many, many times. There is much more evidence supporting Creation, meanwhile evolution has too many impossible components associated. Any way you put it, life springing from amino acids is impossible, because the cell would die. Also, if monkeys evolved into humans, why are monkeys still existing? The so-called fossils have all been either individually disproven or just fragments of a skeleton, like teeth.
Creationism is not science, and to teach it in science classes would be misleading. For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
By performing an experirment
There is no science creation story. There are scientific theories concerning the creation and development of the universe, the formation of the solar system and the earth and the emergence and evolution of life.
the story of creation of luzon
Creation Science Movement was created in 1932.
There is no science about creation. Creation is an unfounded myth with absolutely no evidence to support it. Try asking about evolution instead.
There is none. Certain historians and scientists will misrepresent findings in order to support their faith, but there is no true confirmation of the key events, like the flood (totally disproved) and creation (totally disproved) etc.
chinese creation story
Answer The Lutheran creation story is the Christian creation account found in the Bible primarily in Genesis.
Giorgio Bartoli has written: 'The Biblical story of creation in the light of the recently discovered Babylonian documents' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Creation, Bible and science 'The primitive church and the primacy of Rome' -- subject(s): Popes, Primacy
The story of creation can be found in Genesis 1. The creation of Adam and Eve can be found in Genesis 2.
A theory can be disproved, but despite the weight of evidence in its favour, it can never be proved.