answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It's been the custom in the nations descended from England for that to be the case in criminal matters since 1215. Though one may choose a bench trial where only the Judge decides.

And there are various matters nowadays that while not classified as "criminal" sure have big penalties, and those aren't jury trials. I refer to tax courts, or local councils enforcing building and zoning codes or a variety of business regulatory agencies. In some instances DV courts, if your livelihood depends on firearm use.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Has guilt or innocence always been decided by a jury trial?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

A physical test to determine guilt or innocence was known as a trial by?

A trial by fire.


Which house decides the guilt innocence of the president in an impeachment trial?

The Senate


How was a person's guilt or innocence determined in the 16th century?

In the 16th century, guilt or innocence was often determined through various methods including trial by ordeal, trial by combat, and trial by jury. These trials relied on supernatural beliefs or physical strength to establish innocence. Confessions obtained through torture were also commonly used as evidence of guilt.


A trial jury that must find the guilt or innocence of a person is known as?

Grand jury.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages.?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


Is shrien dewani guilty?

His guilt or otherwise will be decided at his trial.


Can grand gury determine whether defendant in criminal case is guilty?

No, a grand jury does not determine guilt or innocence. Its role is to decide whether there is enough evidence to indict someone and proceed to trial. The trial jury is responsible for determining guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented during the trial.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or the innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were the two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods of deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.