Each housing authority has its own rules by which it administers the Housing Choice Voucher Program, formerly known as Section 8. You must check with the housing authority in that jurisdiction for more information. But the general rule is that anyone who is making less than 75% of the average median income in the area in question can qualify for the voucher. Of course there are specific requirements as well as certain disqualifiers, such as certain felony records.
Section 8 usually does not allow renting out of rooms within the same house.
Where this is concerned, a Section 8 Tenant is no different from anyone else.
if you make your property a section 8 property who is responsible for problems that occur on the house
I have rented to Section 8 tenants and have no complaints. Rent is paid on time. As far as damages, it's like any other tenant. That's why you collect a security deposit and if that doesn't cover damages you can sue the tenant. But a tenant on Section 8, good luck.
It may be that the Housing Autority cancelled the Section 8 contract because of the tenant's breach. In that case, yes, the tenant is simply responsible for all of the rent, and if the tenant does not pay, the landlord should move forward with eviction. But, there is federal regulation saying that the tenant cannot be evicted if the Housing Authority simply stopped paying for some reason that has nothing to do with the tenant, like the housing authoriy's error, or budget problems.
In most states YES, but in some states NO. Check with your state.
Section 8 is a federal program, and the answer, except under specific circumstances where the tenant is disabled and the relative is a caregiver, is no.
Regardless of what state you're in, the section 8 program is the same: its comprised of either public housing or a voucher that guarantees that the landlord will be paid a portion of the rent for a tenant who qualifies in the program, minus the tenant's portion of the rent, which is determined upon commencement of the program.
A section 8 voucher has no impact on the rules of the lease or state laws concerning tenancy. However, if a state allows "self-help" evictions, federal rules override such rules and require that a tenant on Section 8 can only be evicted by judicial action.
Some legal scholars believe that any interference with the mail is a violation of the tenant's right to quiet enjoyment, which isn't a violation of Section 8, just the tenant's rights. A better argument is that it is a violation of Federal Law to interfere with the mail. Talk to the local postmaster.
NO, except under specific circumstances under which the tenant is disabled.
No.