answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Deductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion with certainty, while inductive reasoning aims to support a conclusion with probability.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How are deductive and inductive reasoning diffrent from another?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What is an example of deductive reasoning known as false reasoning?

An example of false deductive reasoning is the slippery slope fallacy, where it is argued that one event will inevitably lead to a series of negative events, without sufficient evidence to support this claim. This type of reasoning assumes that one thing will lead to another in an extreme or exaggerated way, which is not always the case in reality.


What is the best example of inductive reasoning?

I have no idea what the best example is, but here are examples of inductive reasoning:When you eat peanuts, your throat swells making it hard to breath. From this, you conclude you're allergic to peanuts.All cats you are familiar with purr. You conclude all cats must purr.


What is a deductive argument with two premises called?

A deductive argument with two premises is called a syllogism. In a syllogism, one premise is the major premise, another is the minor premise, and they lead to a conclusion.


What is modus ponens?

Modus ponens is a valid form of deductive reasoning that asserts if a conditional statement is true (If P, then Q) and the condition (P) is also true, then the conclusion (Q) must be true. It follows the logical pattern of affirming the antecedent.


Can you give some examples of abstract reasoning?

A clerk at the grocery store registered $40.00 worth of groceries, and a customer gave him $100.00. How much change will he get? If John is in school, then Mary is in school. John is in school. What can you say about Mary?

Related questions

What is an another word for inductive reasoning?

Generalization


What is the difference between the inductive and deductive method of enquiry?

The deductive method starts with a hypothesis and tests it against observations or evidence, leading to a conclusion. Meanwhile, the inductive method involves making observations, identifying patterns, and forming a general theory or hypothesis. Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific instances, while inductive reasoning moves from specific instances to general principles.


Examples of deductive logic?

This is a concept made more complex than necessary. The two complementary processes of inductive vs. deductive are very simply and easily understood. Consider the number series; 3, 5, 7, 'x', 11, 13, 15, 'y' Simple inspection shows this to be a series of 'odd' numbers, what a mathematician would call 'n+1'. Inductive vs. deductive simply describes the 'type' of reasoning used to determine either 'x' or 'y'. Because it lies 'inside' the other data points, the 'deduction' that 'x'=9 is reached by deductive logic, or, deductive reasoning. We 'deduce' x=9. 'y', on the other hand, lies 'outside' the data, i.e. we don't have a '19' on the 'right' of the 'y' to help us 'deduce' the answer. Much riskier than deductive logic/reasoning, we are forced to use less evidence than we did for the 'x' case. This method is called 'inductive logic/reasoning'. For those who've been exposed to just a little math, this process might seem similar to the dual processes of interpolation and extrapolation...that's because...they are. Identical. Smile, nod and thank those who try to convince you there's 'more to it than THAT!!!'. There isn't. 'Guessing' about anything from 'inside' the data = Deduction/Deductive Reasoning/Deductive Logic = fairly 'safe' procedure = (also) Interpolation. 'Guessing' about anything from 'outside' the data = Induction/Inductive Reasoning/Inductive Logic = slightly riskier procedure = (also) Extrapolation Example of Deductive Logic/Reasoning; Sign directly above two identical unmarked doors, saying 'Customer Restrooms'. Man exits 'left' door. Another man exits 'left' door. Person, with 'hoodie' up, leaves 'left' door. Fourth person, man, exits 'left' door. Deduction? Third person, of unknown gender, exiting 'left' door, was a man. Example of Inductive Logic/Reasoning (same scenario); 'Right' door is the 'ladies'. It really is just that simple.


What is an example of deductive reasoning known as false reasoning?

An example of false deductive reasoning is the slippery slope fallacy, where it is argued that one event will inevitably lead to a series of negative events, without sufficient evidence to support this claim. This type of reasoning assumes that one thing will lead to another in an extreme or exaggerated way, which is not always the case in reality.


All kinds of reasoning in geometry?

*analogy- comparison if two things alike in some aspects or they will be sembleone another in other aspect.*intuition - mental ability same as guessing.*inductive - forming of general statement from particular specific case.*deductive - making conclusion from general to particular stances.


What are the different kinds of reasoning in geometry?

*analogy- comparison if two things alike in some aspects or they will be semble one another in other aspect. *intuiton - mental ability same as guessing. *inductive - forming of general statement from particular specific case. *deductive - making conclusion from general to particular stances.


HOW WERE THE CITY-STATES DIFFRENT FROM ONE ANOTHER?

They had diffrent names.


What is the best example of inductive reasoning?

I have no idea what the best example is, but here are examples of inductive reasoning:When you eat peanuts, your throat swells making it hard to breath. From this, you conclude you're allergic to peanuts.All cats you are familiar with purr. You conclude all cats must purr.


What is another term for deductive approach?

logical approch


What are the advantages of modern symbolic logic over classical logic?

What is the major difference between Symbolic logic and Aristotelian logic?1. Traditional Aristotelian logic (also called Classical Deductive Logic or Categorical Syllogisms) is an ancient method of deductive reasoning. Historians say that Aristotle, that ancient Greek philosopher guy, was the first to talk about syllogisms. In ancient Greece, men often first presented their arguments in syllogisms, and then they gave their arguments in a more rhetorical form. Men were held to a higher standard back then. This branch of logic gave us such famous lines of reasoning as:All men are mortal.Socrates is a man.Therefore, Socrates is mortal.2. Modern Symbolic Logic is another method of deductive reasoning developed after the seventeenth century. Gottfried Leibniz and other logicians had a vision for a more simple and useful method for translating ordinary reasoning into a universal language of symbols. Among other things, this method can more quickly analyze longer arguments to see if they are valid. This method of deductive reasoning made logic even more "mathematical." It also made it uglier.This translates into:If p is true, then q is true.p is true.Therefore, q is true.


Inductive reasoning examples?

Inductive reasoning occurs when after noting several observations, one can propose a rule governing the situation. For example, a student notices that 1 times 13 = 13 and 1 times 14 = 14 and 1times 15 = 15. The student concludes that 1 times any number will be the same number. Or as another example, a student notices that for the past 3 Fridays, his math teacher gives a quiz. Today is Friday and the student thinks, 'I bet we have a quiz in math class today.'


What was bacon's theory?

Knowledge cames through observation and experimentation. He also was the inventor of inductive reasoning and is considered the Father of Humanism. Another one of his theories was that all knowledge had to be Empirically (scientifically) verified to be valid. He was an English scientist (1561- 1626) and was knighted for his findings.