0
What is an example of deductive reasoning known as false reasoning?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
An example of false deductive reasoning is the slippery slope fallacy, where it is argued that one event will inevitably lead to a series of negative events, without sufficient evidence to support this claim. This type of reasoning assumes that one thing will lead to another in an extreme or exaggerated way, which is not always the case in reality.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What passage is the best example of deductive reasoning?
One famous example of deductive reasoning is the philosophical argument known as "Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal." This syllogism clearly demonstrates deductive reasoning through a series of logical steps leading to a specific conclusion.
What kind of reasoning proceeds from premises that are known to be true and is then used to arrive at a conclusion that is also known to be true?
Deductive reasoning proceeds from known true premises to a logically necessary true conclusion. This type of reasoning guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
What is an argument known as that starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
What describes deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is derived from a set of premises or statements. It involves making specific predictions based on general principles or assumptions. Deductive reasoning aims to be valid, meaning that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
Inductive and deductive?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning involves starting with general premises and using them to reach specific conclusions. Inductive reasoning is more probabilistic and involves making educated guesses, while deductive reasoning is more logical and deterministic. Both types of reasoning are used to draw conclusions and make decisions in various fields such as science, mathematics, and philosophy.
What kind of reasoning proceeds from premises that are known to be true and is then used to arrive at a conclusion that is also known to be true?
Deductive reasoning proceeds from known true premises to a logically necessary true conclusion. This type of reasoning guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.
Describe a conclusion reached from observations?
A "conjecture" is a conclusion reached simply from observations...this is a process known as "inductive reasoning". An example would be a weather forecast. The difference between "inductive reasoning" and "deductive reasoning" is that with deductive reasoning, the answer must "necessarily" follow from a set of premises. Inductive reasoning is the process by which you make a mathematical "hypothesis" given a set of observations
What is involved in the process for deductive reasoning?
The process of deductive reasoning is a simple one. The reader reasons from one or more statements (also known as the premises) to reach a logical conclusion.
An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as?
inductive-reasoning
What is using general observations to draw specific conclusion known as?
Deductive reasoning
What is deductive analysis?
Deductive analysis is a method of reasoning that involves making specific conclusions based on general principles or theories. It starts with a hypothesis and then tests it against available evidence in order to reach a logical conclusion. This approach is commonly used in mathematics, philosophy, and scientific research to establish relationships between ideas.
What describes deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is derived from a set of premises or statements. It involves making specific predictions based on general principles or assumptions. Deductive reasoning aims to be valid, meaning that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
What is an argument known as that starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
What type of reasoning uses the general knowledge of science to make predictions about specific cases?
Deductive reasoning uses general knowledge of science to make predictions about specific cases.It is not a requirement of deductive reasoning that it include overtly scientific data; the concept is that you start with known information. If your starting premises are true, meanings are unambiguous and applicable rules of logic are followed, then the conclusion is true.
