0
Fossils show the progression of ancient organisms. By comparing older fossils with more recent fossils, we can see how older ones are related in body structure to newer ones, supporting the idea that new generations evolve from older ones.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a factor is not a strong piece of evidence for evolution?
C) Many traits of modern birds resemble the fossils of winged dinosaurs C) Many traits of modern birds resemble the fossils of winged dinosaurs
What five kinds of evidence support Wegener's observation that south America was at one time joined to Africa?
Well I know 4 Rock evidence mountain belt evidence fossil evidence puzzle piece evidence Hope it helped.......
What is one way scientist get information about evolutionary history of species?
There are many ways in which scientists study the evolution of plants. Scientists may choose to study fossils in the area for example.
What is any piece of data that can support an assertion?
evidence
Which piece of evidence should be used to support each and every argument?
proof
What 4 main types of evidence support continental drift theory?
1. continents that existed millions of years ago moved together. 2. when they collide they formed pangea.
Which piece of evidence did wegener use to support his theory on continental drift?
Because he found fossils of plants that has heavy seeds and cant travel with seeds across oceans on a lot of the continents that are separated by oceans. Also, he found an oceanic animal that is only fresh water on parts of land that are separated by salt water. The fossils of the fern like plant was called Glossopteris
Why is it important to recognize and identify evidence in a piece of writing?
Certain papers that you will have to write for school will require you to make an argument of some kind. The importance of recognizing and identifying the evidence in a piece of writing is to properly help support the argument that you are making.
What do scientists study to learn more about early humans?
Scientists study fossils, ancient tools, and DNA to learn more about early humans. By comparing and analyzing these sources of evidence, scientists can piece together information about the behavior, lifestyle, and relationships of our ancestors.
What evidence is presented to support the theory that Pangaea actually existed?
Well, the main answer to this question are the fossils. Since fossils were found in different parts of the world and those fossils are of the same breed or species. Because having the same species in different locations are quite... Unusual, Alfred Wegener developed this theory. Searching for other evidences to prove his theory, he found that pieces of land from another place to another fit's perfectly like a piece of puzzle. This is the second answer to this question.
What can be considered evidence for evolution?
Virtually all species can be arranged into a nested hierarchy highly evocative of common ancestry. That was probably the pivotal piece of evidence launching the theory of evolution as the foundational science of biology. There is also the fossil record which shows us that single celled organisms populated earth's oceans billions of years before the first multicellular organisms appeared. Multicellular organisms themselves dwelled solely in marine environments hundreds of millions of years before the first terrestrial forms gained ground. Fossils of plants and insects are common before any known terrestrial vertebrates. The first of these bear uncanny resemblance to sarcopterygian lungfish of the Devonian. The fossil evidence for evolution continues to mount from there--dinosaurs and birds dominating the mesozoic, mammals and flowering plants running rampant in the cenozoic. In addition to the nested hierarchy and the fossil record there is substantial evidence from molecular biology in support of evolution. DNA sequences in eukaryotes accrue mutations at varying rates that help establish genetic clocks timing diversification events between species. Embryological development is another key piece of evidence indicating common ancestry between species. There are numerous other substantial and significant pieces of evidence, but this small handful is a good start.
When building an outline how should a writer categorize each piece of evidenceAsk us anything?
When building an outline, a writer should categorize each piece of evidence based on its relevance to the main points or arguments. Each piece of evidence should support a specific point or idea in the outline, helping to reinforce the writer's thesis or central argument. It's important to organize evidence cohesively within the outline to ensure a logical flow and effective support for the writer's main ideas.
