Well I know 4 Rock evidence mountain belt evidence fossil evidence puzzle piece evidence Hope it helped.......
because Alfred Wegener stated that the continents seperated there for the parts have seperated.
Amexem is one of the many fictional names of the land mass that includes North, Central, and South America, as well as surrounding islands. This name is used by fake "Moors" to try and claim they were the first inhabitants of the Americas. There is no historical evidence to support this claim
In this economy, the courts are being left with not ordering support, but requires evidence of job search.
No.
A huge body of evidence is often referred to as a "body of literature" or "corpus of evidence." In scientific and academic contexts, it may also be termed a "meta-analysis" if it summarizes findings from multiple studies. This collection of data and research helps to support or refute hypotheses and theories within a particular field.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
Fossil evidence: the discovery of identical fossils on continents separated by vast oceans supports the idea that these landmasses were once joined together. Matching geological features: the alignment of mountain ranges and rock formations on different continents, such as the Appalachian Mountains in North America and the Caledonian Mountains in Europe, provide evidence of past connections.
yes it does.
Facts are pieces of information that can be proven true or valid, while figures and other evidence gathered through observation are known as data or empirical evidence. These data points help support or refute various claims or hypotheses.
If the bubbles produced can relight a glowing splint or support combustion, it would provide indirect evidence that the bubbles are oxygen (O2). This is because oxygen is required to support combustion.
Abraham Ortelius, in his 1596 work "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum," noted the jigsaw-like fit of the continents, particularly South America and Africa. He suggested that the continents were once joined and have since drifted apart. This observation provided early support for Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift, which proposed that continents were once part of a single landmass before separating over geological time. Ortelius's ideas contributed to the growing body of evidence that suggested the mobility of Earth's landmasses.
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
Empirical evidence is based on direct observation or experience rather than theory or logic. It is verifiable through experimentation or observation and can be used to support or refute hypotheses. Empirical evidence is often used in scientific research to make conclusions based on real-world data.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities among different species, and the observation of natural selection in action were some of the key pieces of evidence used to support the idea of evolution when it was first proposed.
Theories don't support theories.Only evidence that comes from observation or experiment supports or demolishes theories.
The observation in an experiment is typically referred to as data. This data is collected and analyzed to draw conclusions and support the experiment's hypotheses or research questions. It is crucial in the scientific method for making evidence-based claims.
South America and Africa are often considered to fit together well due to their similar shapes along the Atlantic Ocean coastlines. This observation was one of the key pieces of evidence used to support the theory of plate tectonics and the concept of continental drift.