Evolution and speciation. ( microevolution is imprecise )
Alleles can change over time in a population of organisms without any great change in the phenotype or behavior of a species. Then, to keep it simple, a geographic barrier arises between portions of the population and they can no longer interbreed, Mutations happen in the separate populations and evolution can take two different paths now with natural selection driving the winnowing of variations so that adaptive change is happening in the immediate environment of the sundered populations. Given enough time the two populations gene pools will have such a variance in the alleles contained in those two gene pools that two different species will arise.
Some would call that microevolution. I would not. Some divide evolution into micro and macro. Evolutionary biologists prefer to use the terms evolution and speciation.
Basically, there's only one type: the shifting in allele frequencies in populations over the generations, driven by reproductive variation, differential reproductive success, and various molecular mechanisms in genetics. There are however numerous distinct phenomena associated with this mechanism, and different patterns to the way it affects populations, depending on circumstances. If one looks at the different 'modes' of speciation, for instance, even though they all follow from the same basic mechanisms, there are allopatric speciation, peripatric speciation, parapatric speciation, and sympatric speciation, each achieving the same thing through the same mechanisms but via slightly different paths.
Given the opportunity for reproductive isolation between subpopulations to develop, macroevolution seems like an inevitable consequence of microevolution. Not only can speciation occur (and not only is it observed): it's hard to imagine how it could not occur.
This process is known as speciation, where a new species is formed due to the accumulation of genetic differences over many generations. As populations diverge through microevolution, they can eventually become reproductively isolated from each other, leading to the formation of distinct species.
Yes. In fact, microevolution, or allelic variance, is the mechanism by which new species emerge. Such an emergence is part of what some people call macroevolution. In other words, microevolution is the mechanism by which macroevolution is produced.
Some would call that microevolution. I would not. Some divide evolution into micro and macro. Evolutionary biologists prefer to use the terms evolution and speciation.
Microevolution can lead to Microevolution
Basically, there's only one type: the shifting in allele frequencies in populations over the generations, driven by reproductive variation, differential reproductive success, and various molecular mechanisms in genetics. There are however numerous distinct phenomena associated with this mechanism, and different patterns to the way it affects populations, depending on circumstances. If one looks at the different 'modes' of speciation, for instance, even though they all follow from the same basic mechanisms, there are allopatric speciation, peripatric speciation, parapatric speciation, and sympatric speciation, each achieving the same thing through the same mechanisms but via slightly different paths.
Given the opportunity for reproductive isolation between subpopulations to develop, macroevolution seems like an inevitable consequence of microevolution. Not only can speciation occur (and not only is it observed): it's hard to imagine how it could not occur.
This process is known as speciation, where a new species is formed due to the accumulation of genetic differences over many generations. As populations diverge through microevolution, they can eventually become reproductively isolated from each other, leading to the formation of distinct species.
Speciation.
microevolution can lead to macroevolution
Yes. In fact, microevolution, or allelic variance, is the mechanism by which new species emerge. Such an emergence is part of what some people call macroevolution. In other words, microevolution is the mechanism by which macroevolution is produced.
Miroevolution is the change in allele frequency overtime in populations of organisms not leading to speciation; below the taxa level. Macroevolution is speciation. This terminology is not favored by many biologists because there is some implied difference in processes. That is to get from micro to macro. Actually evolution long enough is macro. So, many biologist prefer the terms. Evolution Speciation instead of micro and macro
Microevolution and Macroevolution : NovaNet
notion
Scientists use many different things to study microevolution. One tool they use is called Mendel's Accountant, which allows realistic numerical simulation of the mutation/selection process.