0
How are the 3 branches of the US government alike to Athenians and the roman government?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
They are not comparable.
Athens' democracy was direct. This means that people did not elect representatives. Bills were not voted by something like a US congress, but by the people who gathered in an assembly. Courts were very different. They were seen as exercising the will of the people. They were not professional. There were no presiding judges, jurors received no legal direction and there were no lawyers. Parties represented themselves. For private litigation the victims prosecuted. For private cases anyone could prosecute because they were community cases. Jury panels were large, from 201 to 501. At one point courts became able to override the assembly. Matters put to the assembly could be blocked before the vote and put for review by the court, which could annul it and penalise the proposer. If the court approved, the bill did not go back to the assembly. The court could also annul a law passed by the assembly. Someone who lost a vote could prosecute both the proposers of the law and the law itself. From 403 BC laws were not made by the assembly, but by juries. The executive did not have political power. It oversaw administrators, but did not play a part in policy making. It executed the wished of the assembly as determined by its vote.
Rome did not have something like a US congress either. Bills were voted by the people in assemblies such as that of the tribes, that of the soldiers and the plebeian council. Bills were originally proposed by the consuls (heads of the city), but became increasingly the initiatives of the plebeian tribunes who were not officers of state. Trials were conducted originally by the consuls and then by the praetor who became the second highest officer of state. Therefore, executive and judiciary were not separated though an independent judiciary. An officer of state presided over judicial matters. The assembly of the soldiers and the assembly of the tribes acted as courts of appeal until Sulla instituted a special jury for this in 107 BC. The senate wielded important power, but was not an elected body. The executive was composed by elected magistrates (officers of state) instead of being appointed by a president or prime minister. Therefore, the executive was not a centralised body as today. The consuls were the elected heads of the city. There were two of them and their term of office was just one year. They also commanded the army. Thus, the military was not separated from civilian authority and there was not a separate chief of staff. Magistrates of the same rank could veto each other, and magistrates of higher rank could veto magistrates of lower rank.
Such institutions cannot be compared to modern institutions. The societies in question were completely different than modern society.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Into how many branches was the government of the early roman republic divided?
12
What way does the US government differ from the Roman Republic?
The United States has three branches of government and so did the Roman Republic. One big difference is, the Roman Republic could appoint a dictator in times of crises. This is something the US cannot do.
How many branches of government did the roman government have?
The Roman Republic did not have a centralised government like a cabinet or administration. There were five types of officers of state who carried out executive functions independently within the remit of their offices. The plebeian tribunes, who were the representatives of the plebeians and were not officers of state, had the authority to present bill for the vote of the Plebeian council, appeal against actions of the officers of state and veto laws. The unelected senate could issue decrees.
What were the three branches of the Roman government?
First there are The Magistrates: They represented the tradition of monarchy.Secondly, There are the Senate: It represented the tradition of oligarchy.Lastly, the Assemblies represented the democratic element of the Roman Republic.
Why did the Romans create a tripartite government?
The Roman government is erroneously called a tripartite because someone is/was determined to read something into Roman government that was never there, such as a government made up of three components or branches like the government of the United States. The Roman government was a bipartite -- it consisted of two parts, not three. The two parts of the Roman government were the Senate and the Roman people. (SPQR) All the Roman magistrates were members of the senate and they were elected to their offices by the Roman people in the various assemblies. There was no separate justice department. The dispensing of justice fell under the authority of the praetors who were members of the senate.
What are the three branches of roman government?
The ancient Romans did not have three branches of government. Their government could be loosely divided into two branches, the Senate and the Roman People. SPQR. The Executive, Legislative and Judicial are an American innovation.
Into how many branches was the government of the early roman republic divided?
12
What was the three part government of rome called?
Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.
List some roman accomplishments?
pillars, concrete, sewage, plumbing, organized military, senate and branches of government.
How did Ancient Rome affect our government today?
We have the same type and form of the Roman empire today, with three branches
Did ancient Rome have three branches of government?
No, the Roman republic did not have three branches of government. They only had two, hence the motto SPQR---the Senate and the Roman People. The Senate could roughly be defined as the upper branch and the popular assemblies could roughly be defined as the representative branch. The Praetors, who, among other things, corresponded to our judges or judicial branch of government, were a part of the Senatorial branch of government.
What way does the US government differ from the Roman Republic?
The United States has three branches of government and so did the Roman Republic. One big difference is, the Roman Republic could appoint a dictator in times of crises. This is something the US cannot do.
How many branches of government did the roman government have?
The Roman Republic did not have a centralised government like a cabinet or administration. There were five types of officers of state who carried out executive functions independently within the remit of their offices. The plebeian tribunes, who were the representatives of the plebeians and were not officers of state, had the authority to present bill for the vote of the Plebeian council, appeal against actions of the officers of state and veto laws. The unelected senate could issue decrees.
How does the US government differ from the Roman Republic government?
In Rome there was an obvious divide between the rich and poor, and they were represented by difference branches of government. In the US, the constitution states that everyone is equal before the law regardless of wealth. The Roman constitution had three branches: the legislative (based on the Athens democracy), the executive (based on the Spartan oligarchy) and the judidical (based on the previous monarchy) and the US constitution was a vast improvement on this.
Two individuals were selected each year to serve in wich of these branches of roman government?
The ancient Roman government elected two consuls every year. They elected two people to serve in the lead position as a separation of power.
What type of government did Rome have after the Etruscan king?
After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.After the kings, the Roman government was the republic.
What government is us government based on?
Roman. Like Rome, we're a tripartite, three part, government. We have three branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, whereas Rome had Senate and the Assembly of Centuries (Legislative), Consuls (Executive), and Praetors (Judicial).
