0
If new evidence comes to light then it will change an historians view on it, if they write for example that John Wilkes Booth killed Lincoln and they stick by that view, and then they find new evidence that George from booth number 5 did it then of course the interpretation of that event will change and so will everybody's views on it
What else can I help you with?
Which of the following statement about interpreting historical evidence is true?
New sources and ideas may change the interpreting of events
True or false Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence?
True. Conclusions related to historical events are based on evaluating existing evidence such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts. These conclusions are subject to change as new evidence is discovered or alternative interpretations are considered.
Why did the croatan Indians kill the the colonists of the lost colony?
It isn’t sure they did. In fact, new historical evidence points to the possibility that they lived with them. They had a village down river from the colony and recent historical evidence has found English items in the village and evidence they were living with them.
Under what conditions can a scientific model or theory change?
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
Can views of history change?
yes, if new evidence is found
Can you be retried with new evidence presented in a case?
Yes, a person can be retried with new evidence presented in a case, as long as the new evidence was not available during the original trial and could potentially change the outcome.
When do biological classification scheme change?
as new evidence and more kinds of organism are discovered
What idea about the atom change when new evidence was discovered?
atoms cannot be divided
Which is true scientific knowledge?
it changes as new evidence is found. it is open to change
What factors can cause an interpretation of past events to change?
New evidence coming to light, shifts in societal perspectives, changes in cultural interpretations, and advancements in historical research methods can all cause a reevaluation and change in the interpretation of past events.
When did Abraham Lincoln go to new Salem Virgina?
Historical evidence suggests he moved there somewhere around 1831
Why is much of history is still open to interpretation?
History is open to interpretation because it relies on analyzing and interpreting sources that are often incomplete, biased, or have different perspectives. Historians bring their own perspectives and biases to their interpretations, leading to differing conclusions. Additionally, new evidence or discoveries can challenge existing interpretations, leading to ongoing debate and revision of historical narratives.
