Want this question answered?
We need a microscope to see cells because they are too small to see without one.
Sperm cells are way too small to see with the naked eye. You need a microscope to see the individual cells. Now you can see semen as a whole without a microscope, and semen is usually cloudy white in appearance.
The invention of the microscope was important in the study of cells because only the microscope can see very small organism.
Blood cells are tiny you can only see them using a microscope. They are not HUGE! As an elephant they are trying to trick you.
The microscope that is more useful to estimate red blood cells is an electron microscope because it can magnify to see cells that other microscopes can't see such as the light microscope
Because cells are way to small to see without a microscope.
Because cells were difficult to see without a microscope.
We need a microscope to see cells because they are too small to see without one.
no u can not
A microscope.
All living things large enough to see without a microscope have cells.
We need a microscope to see cells because they are too small to see without one.
Sperm cells are way too small to see with the naked eye. You need a microscope to see the individual cells. Now you can see semen as a whole without a microscope, and semen is usually cloudy white in appearance.
The invention of the microscope was important in the study of cells because only the microscope can see very small organism.
Because without it we couldn't see cells
No...you could see cells with a microscope.
Blood cells are tiny you can only see them using a microscope. They are not HUGE! As an elephant they are trying to trick you.