Best Answer

A. If his scientists had been successful in producing the atomic bomb. (They were close).

B. If he had left military strategy to his highly qualified generals and staff.

C. If he could have pursued war on only one front at a time. He was fighting the Russions to the east and British/Americans to the west.


Post-war documents show (A) as highly unlikely - even without Allied destruction of heavy water supplies, German atomic research was crippled by lack of resources (both funding and manpower), and political infighting. The German atomic bomb project was effectively abandoned in mid-1942 (research continued, but not at the "crash" program level required to produce a working bomb). German estimates were that such a weapon, while feasible, would not be developed by anyone for use in WW2.

(B) is also highly debatable. Interference in tactical decisions (particularly 1941 and later) by Hitler undoubtably severely hurt German chances. However, many strategic military/political decisions made by Hitler were superior to those being made/recommended by the German General Staff (many of whom were very conservative in their military planning).

Two Strategic errors and two tactical mistakes are key in German defeat:

A primary fatal error in German conduct of WW2 was the declaration of war on the U.S.A. in December 1941, after the Japanese attack. This was NOT required by their treaty with Japan, and the U.S.A. was not immediately inclined to declare war on German (and was not immediately looking to fight a 2-front war). Postponing direct American involvement in the European theater by even a year would have vastly increased Germany's chances for a more favorable outcome.

The other fatal error which effectively wiped out German chances for winning a longer war was the very poor organization of the German war industry. The entire German war effort was not even placed under central direction until late 1942. German industrial production suffered from poor allocation of scarce resources, inefficient competition, severe political infighting, and poor design choices. In particular, German industry tended to produce overly-engineered products which required very long (and complex) manufacturing, and designs were often chosen to satisfy political (rather than operational or military) purposes.

Tactically, the failure of Germany to secure its communications is a huge (and many historians see as perhaps the single-most decisive) factor in the increasingly poor strategic performance of the German military. Faster Enigma key rotation, and better communications security would have radically cut back on the success of Ultra (the Allied code-breaking project). Much (if not most) strategic success of the Allies in 1942-1943 is due to the Allied ability to "read the German mind". Without such intimate knowledge of German plans and responses, the Allies would have had to fight on a much more even basis against the German military, which was demonstrably superior tactically.

The other tactical mistake made by Germany was not to continue unrestricted submarine warfare in 1940-41. Such warfare would almost certainly have strangled Great Britain, forcing it to sue for peace. British/American countermeasures in 40-41 were very weak, and the volume of u-boat sinkings was such Britain could not feed itself (or import enough materials to fight). Fears that continued u-boat warfare would bring the U.S.A. into WW2 during 1940 were reasonable, but the counter-benefit would have been a british surrender by no later than 1941. Without the British Empire, an American invasion of Europe/Africa would have been almost impossible to accomplish, and American re-supply of the U.S.S.R. would have been many times more difficult.


The German Generals were actually quite intellegent, and had it not been for Hitler's everything or nothing stance on places such as El Alemain, Stalingrad and St. Petersburg the Generals such as Rommel would have had ample chances to claim numerous victories, for example had Rommel been given the troops he requested in North Africa which were being used in reserve, El Alemain would have been a German victory.

What was also a wasted gold mine was the mostly unguarded middle east. Its vast oil supplies were there for the taking, but it was Hitler's stubborness that bypssed walking through Turkey into the middle-east, taking the needed oil, bypassing the caucuses, up through Georgia and Azerbyjan, behind Stalingrad, taking Moscow by 2 fronts within a matter of weeks. Stalingrad would have been the last stand of the Soviets but to much less of a degree than what actually happened.

What is also interesting was the efficiency of the Wehrmacht. Outnumbered in many departments, the rate of German firepower, man power, supply lines when at the height of the war was nothing short of staggering.

Field Marshall Herman Goering was as much a thorn in Germany's side as was Hitler's as a tactician. His manovering of the Luftwafte in a mini carpet bombing was a major let down. Had he concentrated on vast bombardment on Brighton, Plymouth, Dover, Southampton and Exeter with London as a scare tactic instead of journeying to Nottingham, Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool and Bristol with more effect, with the help of German U-Boats and Destroyers using the occupied Channel Islands to station artillery, an invasion could have happened.

Germany could have won World War 2 suprisingly easily with Russia under control of the SS, England would have not only sought peace, but could have gained from a German victory with substantial trade and territorial gain in Europe according to the sorts of peace settlements offered to Britain, appealing especially to Lord Halifax and the Labour leaders supisingly. The USA would not find war with Germany as an option apart from attacking Japan had Pearl Harbor been attacked. Rommel could have instramented one of the most awe inspiring take overs of northern and central Africa, and life as we know it could be so much more different.

User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 2013-03-27 15:56:32
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How could Hitler have won World War 2?
Write your answer...
Related questions

Did Hitler won World War 2?

Hitler lost the war and committed suicide in 1945.

When do Hitler won the World War 2?

Hitler lost WW 2.

When did Hitler win World War 1?

Hitler never won WW1 or 2 for that matter.

Did Hitler won World War 1?

Hitler wasn't part of world war I. He emerged as a savior to the German people before WWII.

When did the 2nd world war finish?

It was 1945 hahahaha hitler we won

Why was Australia's economy so low after World War 2?

because Hitler won the war.

What world event gave Hitler the opportunity to rise to power?

he won the war

World war 2 won?

The Germans, that is why we salute Hitler statues everyday.

Could russia ended World War 2 earlier?

The Red Army probably could have ended the war earlier but Adolf Hitler ended early because of all his blunders and depletion of men and warfare implements and FOOD. Had the Wehrmacht Generals ran the war and Hitler stayed in Bavaria they could have most likely won the war.

Hitler and World War 2?

Hitler is the German leader who started world war 2 we won the war because when the Germans were losing Hitler commited suicide by poisoining himself but he cruely tested the poison on his dog 1st

How was ww you won?

The second world war was won by eventually pushing the German forces from the rest of Europe back to Germany. Many people say that Hitler could of won WW2 if only he did not attack the Soviet Union earlier in the war. Eventually Hitler commited suicide as the British and American forces were closing in on his position

Why did World war 2 invade the world?

Hitler and the NAZI party wanted a world without Jews involved so they declared war on the world and almost won

How could Germany have won World War I?

No didn't win the won in World War I,they lose,since been surrounded. But they later they caused World War II.

What are some possible arguments for an essay on if Hitler had listened to his generals Germany could have won the war?


What happens if Hitler won the Holocaust?

You are confusing the Holocaust with World War 2. See related question.

What would happen to us if Hitler won world war 2?

Hitler's plan was to move on to the United States after he was done with Europe and England. So, if this had happened he planned to have a world dictatorship.

What if Hitler had won the Battle of Britain?

If Hitler had won the Battle of Britain, It would have been less likely for the US to get involved in the European war. Low chance but plausible for the Germans to have won the war.

How did World War 2 in Germany end?

Germany was losing World War 2 so Hitler killed himself. Then, the Americans won and Germany was divided into four sectors.

Why did Hitler win support in Germany?

Hitler won support in Germany because he used extreme nationalism to bind the country together after a crushing defeat in World War I.

Would Germany have won World War 2 if Hitler had not given so many resources to the Holocaust and how?

It's possible.

What if the Nazis won the war?

Hitler would not have committed suicide

Why did Hitler blame World War I on the Jews?

Simply because he could. Many people viewed Germany's surrender at the end of WWI as unnecessary, that Germany could have won and the surrender was negotiated by Jewish politicians and bureaucrats and was a betrayal of those fighting.

What would have happened if Hitler would have won the Britain war?

then hitler would make britain a dictatorship

How would the world be different if the Axis Powers won World War 2?

The World Would Probably Be The Same as It Is Today... But It Could Be That Hitler Would Have Killed A Lot More English, Polish, Dutch, French And Maybe Even Italian People!

Can Germany take over the world?

During ww2, Germany could of won the war

Study guides

Create a Study Guide