First answer (I'm not sure that this addresses the question):
The treatment here in the US is barbaric. Cut and burn is what they do in the US. Look to go to Another Country that 'thinks outside' the box in terms of treating breast cancer and you can get your cancer treated and get to keep your breasts too!
Second answer:
The odds of surviving breast cancer are much better than surviving cancers at most other site locations. Pancreatic cancer victims, for example, have just a 5% chance of survival. However, there are far more breast cancer cases than most other site locations (except prostate cancer), so deciding how deadly it is takes a bit of analysis and a bit of philosophy. Does "deadly" refer to the total number of deaths or to how likely one is to die once they have become afflicted? Each person must decide that individually.
The Information Please Almanac's compilation of data from the American Cancer Society, U.S. National Institutes of Health, and National Cancer Institute tells us the 5 year survivability rate for breast cancer in the US is 90% for whites, and 77% for blacks. I'm estimating this means (.87* .9 + .13 * .77 = ) 88% overall. Early detection and treatment is key. In 2007 there were 180,510 estimated new cases of breast cancer about 1% of whom were men. That means that over the next 5 years, if survival rates remain unchanged, approximately 21,661 (12%) of these people will die of the condition.
Comparatively, lung cancer has a 15/12% white/black 5 yr survival rate est. 14% overall. In 2007, there were 213,380 new cases of lung cancer. That means 183,506 of these people are likely to die of lung cancer over the next 5 years. That is 8.5 times the number of people that will die of breast cancer and more than the total number of new breast cancer cases surviving or not. But the largest killer is heart disease. Heart disease killed 631,636 persons in 2006 including 315,930 women - more than half of the total and 14.6 times the number of all breast cancer deaths (men & women).
So, how deadly is breast cancer? The rest is an individual and philosophical decision. Chances are if you had a family member that died of breast cancer you'll say it is "very" deadly. If you had a family member that died of cancer at another site location or heart disease you're likely to wonder what all the breast cancer hoopla is about.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0883543.html#axzz12R7XmUYH
http://www.infoplease.com/us/statistics/leading-causes-death.html
Yes, breast cancer is the leading cause of death in women followed by lung cancer and colon cancer in second and third places respectively.
Cervical
Non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes are the leading causes of death in Fiji. These diseases are often linked to lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and tobacco and alcohol use.
Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death in women
The leading causes of death in 1980 were 1. Heart Disease 2. Stroke, 3. Other Heart Diseases and 4. Breast Cancer.
Lung, stomach, liver, colon and breast cancer cause the most cancer deaths each year.
no, the leading cause of deaths by a cancer is stomach cancer
lung cancer
nicotine.
No. The leading cause of death for men is heart attack/disease.
Pancreatic cancer is ranked the 14th leading cause of cancer in the Philippines. It is the 10th leading cause of death due to cancer.
Lung Cancer
the second leading cause of death in the US is cancer.
leukemia