Whole books could be - and have been - written on this subject. But these impacts were, among others:
- it got the US in a war with two nations, Iraq and Afghanistan, and toppled their leadership
- it disturbed relations between the US and many of its allies, especially those who didn't support the US' policy of immediately invading these two countries. Especially relations between the US and France went to sub-zero levels for a while.
- it severely disturbed relations between Turkey, Iraq and Iran, because each population group in Iraq - Shiite muslim, Sunni muslim an Kurd - sought help from their fellows in these countries to support them in their struggle for power and/or autonomy
- even the present civil war in Syria can be seen as a continuation of the Shiite/Sunnite power struggle that began back then.
9/11 also impacted (through the US response) the relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan and between Pakistan and the US, mainly because of the love/hate relationship that developed because of the US dependency on Pakistani logistical support, the drone attacks that are seen by Pakistan as a US infringement of Pakistani sovereignty and the almost take-over of many Pakistani districts by the Taliban.
There are no reasons why an individual would belong to the state. That is slavery. Governments don’t own people.
In total 3,497 people died in the attacks on 11 September 2001. 2,740 Americans Died in the September 11 attacks.
The federal government responded to the 9/11 attacks by passing the USA Patriot Act.
The terrorist attacks of September 11 left Americans being afraid and vulnerable. No longer could public safety be assumed. The attacks led to a surge in prejudice against Middle Easterners and Muslims.
It was hit and run attacks and sneak or surprise attacks
No, otherwise NATO would not plan the attacks.
There wouldn't be a relation between ice cream sales and shark attacks. What kind of question is that? Are you out of your mind?
moderate
protection from attacks.
protection from attacks
Coral Bell has written: 'The diplomacy of detente' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, Detente 'Crises and Australian diplomacy' -- subject(s): Crisis management in government, Foreign relations 'Australia's alliance options' -- subject(s): ANZUS Council, Alliances, Foreign relations, Sources, World politics 'The Reagan paradox' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, History, Republican Party (U.S. : 1854- ) 'President Carter and foreign policy' -- subject(s): Foreign relations 'A world out of balance' -- subject(s): Forecasting, Balance of power, World politics, International relations, Foreign relations 'The first war of the 21st century' -- subject(s): War on Terrorism, 2001-, September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, Foreign relations, Jihad, Military art and science, Military relations, Asymmetric warfare
David P. Forsythe has written: 'Human Rights and Peace' -- subject(s): Human rights, Peace 'The United Nations in the World Political Economy' 'Human Rights in the New Europe' 'The politics of prisoner abuse' -- subject(s): Prisoners of war, War on Terrorism, 2001-2009, September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, Abuse of, Torture, Political prisoners 'Human rights and world politics' -- subject(s): Civil rights, Foreign relations, Human rights, World politics 'The politics of international law' -- subject(s): Foreign relations, International law 'Human Rights in International Relations'
NATO
moderate
Brutal, conflicts, conhfrontation, cross border attacks, on the verge of war
Tara Bapa Ni ghand
According to the International Shark Attack File, there are approximately 47 attacks per year, worldwide. However, this includes minor "bump and bite" encounters. There is an average of only 8.25 fatal shark attacks per year. Source: http://www.thescubasite.com/Latest-Scuba-Diving-News/where-shark-attacks-happen