0
How did Aristotle differentiate natural motion from violent motion?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
di ko nga lam ee!
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Aristotle distinguished natural motion as the inherent tendency of objects to move towards their natural place in the cosmos, while violent motion is imposed on objects externally by an external force. Natural motion is seen as orderly and goal-oriented, while violent motion is considered irregular and disruptive.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the contribution of Aristotle in force?
Aristotle's contribution to force was primarily in the realm of philosophy and physics, where he developed the concept of natural motion and violent motion. He believed that objects had a natural tendency to move towards their proper place in the universe, and that an external force was required to cause violent motion. Aristotle's ideas on force laid the foundation for later developments in classical mechanics.
What distinction did Aristotle make between natural motion and violent motion?
Aristotle distinguished between natural motion, which he believed occurred without external force (e.g. a rock falling downwards), and violent motion, which required an external force to cause movement (e.g. a rock being thrown). Natural motion was thought to be inherent to objects based on their nature, while violent motion was considered to be caused by an external force acting upon an object.
Were aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion quantitative or qualitative?
Aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion were qualitative rather than quantitative. He described the motion of celestial bodies in terms of their natural behavior and relationships rather than using mathematical equations or measurements.
What was Aristotle's view of gravity?
Aristotle did not have a concept of gravity as we understand it today. He believed that objects fell to the Earth because it was their natural place, based on their elemental composition. This idea of natural motion was different from the concept of gravitational attraction developed later by Isaac Newton.
What was Aristotle's theory of motion?
Aristotle's theory of motion stated that natural objects move towards their natural place or state. He believed that objects on Earth moved towards the center of the universe, in straight lines or circles. Aristotle's theory was widely accepted for centuries until the development of modern physics in the 17th century.
What were the two main classifications of motion in Aristotle's view of nature?
Natural motion and Violent motion
What is the contribution of Aristotle in force?
Aristotle's contribution to force was primarily in the realm of philosophy and physics, where he developed the concept of natural motion and violent motion. He believed that objects had a natural tendency to move towards their proper place in the universe, and that an external force was required to cause violent motion. Aristotle's ideas on force laid the foundation for later developments in classical mechanics.
What was Aristotle's law of motion?
Aristotle believed v = k(F/R) where speed is proportional to motive force, and inversely proportional to resistance.
What distinction did Aristotle make between natural motion and violent motion?
Aristotle distinguished between natural motion, which he believed occurred without external force (e.g. a rock falling downwards), and violent motion, which required an external force to cause movement (e.g. a rock being thrown). Natural motion was thought to be inherent to objects based on their nature, while violent motion was considered to be caused by an external force acting upon an object.
What state of motion did Aristotle attribute to the Earth?
natural motion c:
Difference between natural motion and violent motion.?
euphoria, endorphin and morpheme
What are the 2 types of motion according to Aristotle?
Natural motion: Where he states that objects naturally seek a place of restImposed Motion: Forces exerting on an object will allow it to move
Were Aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion quantitative or qualiative?
I. Aristotle's Theory of Motion • Two basic principles: I. No motion without a mover in contact with moving body. II. Distinction between: (a) Natural motion: mover is internal to moving body (b) Forced motion: mover is external to moving body
Were aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion quantitative or qualitative?
Aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion were qualitative rather than quantitative. He described the motion of celestial bodies in terms of their natural behavior and relationships rather than using mathematical equations or measurements.
What was Aristotle's view of gravity?
Aristotle did not have a concept of gravity as we understand it today. He believed that objects fell to the Earth because it was their natural place, based on their elemental composition. This idea of natural motion was different from the concept of gravitational attraction developed later by Isaac Newton.
What was Aristotle's theory of motion?
Aristotle's theory of motion stated that natural objects move towards their natural place or state. He believed that objects on Earth moved towards the center of the universe, in straight lines or circles. Aristotle's theory was widely accepted for centuries until the development of modern physics in the 17th century.
What did Aristotle think was the natural state of objects?
Aristotle believed that the natural state of objects was to seek a state of rest or motion that was in accordance with their inherent properties. He classified objects into four elements (earth, water, air, fire) and believed that each element had a natural place in the cosmos.
