Britain could have accepted many more refugees before the World War 2 started. It could also have eased some of the restrictions on Jewish migration to Palestine, which at that time included present day Israel and was under British rule. It could also have also have allowed Jews to migrate to some of the colonies in the Britsh Empire.
Yes. They could have opened up Mandatory Palestine to widescale Jewish Immigration. This would have provided Jews a place to run without Britain having to shoulder the burden of taking Jews in.
Probably
Well, Russia and Germany wanted to split Poland, so France and Great Britain sent typical troops to fight the battle, this was done in the common style of the time of warfare, only Germany used special tactics which was a "Blitzkrieg". The French typically were a weak ally of Great Britain only because they would lose all of France to Germany so easily.
No, 6 million of them were killed. Given this number it is clear that the US did not do enough to prevent it. You may say that other countries should have done more too, but most of them were fighting for survival themselves and could do no more than they did.
Germany was bombing England in WW2. This was done to demoralize the English and to destroy manufacturing and shipping centers...basically to cause infrastructure damage.
Actually the first invasion of Britain was not done by an emperor it was done by Julius Caesar who was then a general and Governor
No one knew that the Holocaust would happen, not even those in charge of it.
The US and other countries could have objected to Germany's persecution of Jews before the war. The fact that they did not led Germany to believe that it could do whatever they wanted without interference.
The US and other countries could have objected to Germany's persecution of Jews before the war. The fact that they did not led Germany to believe that it could do whatever they wanted without interference.
The Jews were forced to build a wall. This was done so the Jews could not escape until the Germans could send them to concentration camps. Many were sent to Treblinka for extermination.
France would only take action against Germany if brittain helped them. Britain declined and so nothing was done against the Germans. If France had acted against Germany, Germany would have been in no fit state to defend them and the 3rd Reich could have been over. bus due to Britain's policy of appeasement nothing was done. this gave Germany a strong border in the west and enabled them to focus their attention on the east, especially the sudetenland in chezoslovakia, as Germany continued to re-arm and Britain continued to appease them until September 3rd 1939 when ww2 began. euan999@hotmail.co.UK
It brought Germany into disrepute as nothing else could have done ...
They could have lowered the taxes for a little while.
The Jews had done nothing to Hitler, yet he harbored an enormous hatred against them. He believed they were responsible for all the economic hardship that Germany had faced since World War I.
It is a historical classification. Germans of today see their state (the Federal Republic of Germany) as a completely different creation from the Third Reich from the ground up. As a result, they find the idea that their country should be called the same as the horrendous regime of Nazi Germany to be insulting to the work that they have done in reparation and atonement.
The decision to divide Germany into four zones of occupation was made by the Allies (United States, Soviet Union, Britain, and France) at the end of World War II. It was primarily done to prevent Germany from becoming a unified and potentially powerful country that could pose a threat to European security, as it had done in the past. Additionally, the division allowed the Allies to maintain control and oversee the process of denazification and reconstruction in Germany.
Conventional wisdom (as it crystallized in the summer of 1940) says yes. However, those who take this view seldom agree on what Britain could have done in practical terms. There is sometimes the suggestion that a thunderous roar of disapproval from Parliament when Germany announced massive rearmament in 1935 together with the reintroduction of conscription would have done the trick ... It would certainly have shown Hitler that his hopes for an alliance with Britain were unrealistic. Part of the problem is that the British and French governments had enormous difficulty understanding what they were dealing with. There were very few senior people in the British Foreign Office with much knowledge of Germany at that time. Britain was not alone in this failure to grasp the psychopathic nature of the Nazi regime - their philosophy of "we do what we can get away with". About 24 hours before the Netherlands was invaded on 10 May 1940 the Dutch government was warned by two of its agents in Germany of the invasion. The predominant reaction was disbelief. After all, they told themselves, they had been strictly neutral and done nothing to offend Germany.
had the allies (Britain the U.S. and Canada) not invaded Normandy or had been push back into the sea, Germany could have concentrated the forces on the eastern front where they were losing to Russia. Had they done they done this they could have prolonged the war if not won it all together, had that happened this answer would be in German. Hope it helped.
had the allies (Britain the U.S. and Canada) not invaded Normandy or had been push back into the sea, Germany could have concentrated the forces on the eastern front where they were losing to Russia. Had they done they done this they could have prolonged the war if not won it all together, had that happened this answer would be in German. Hope it helped.