answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Brown admired the Free-Staters for their resistance to pro-slavery forces in Kansas. He believed in using violent means to fight against slavery, and he saw their actions as justifiable in the fight for freedom.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did Brown feel about the Free-Staters with their response to the violence in Kansas?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

When did the Abolitionist John Brown kill four pro slavery men in Kansas?

John Brown killed four pro-slavery men in Pottawatomie Creek, Kansas on May 24, 1856. This event, known as the Pottawatomie massacre, was part of Brown's violent campaign against slavery in the Kansas Territory.


John Brown was right to use violence to protest slavery explain?

While John Brown's passion and commitment to ending slavery are commendable, his use of violence can be seen as morally questionable. While some argue that violence was necessary to provoke change, others believe that non-violent methods could have been more effective in achieving the same goal. Overall, Brown's actions remain a point of controversy in the discussion of the abolitionist movement.


Was a radical settler who thought that abolitionist should use violence?

John Brown was a radical settler who believed in using violence to abolish slavery. He led a raid in 1859 on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in an attempt to spark a slave rebellion. Brown was captured and later executed for his actions.


Who was john brown and what did he do at the pottawatomie creek?

John Brown was an American abolitionist who believed in using violent means to end slavery. At Pottawatomie Creek in May 1856, Brown and his followers killed five pro-slavery settlers in what became known as the Pottawatomie Massacre. This event further escalated the tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in Kansas during the Bleeding Kansas period.


Why was John Brown wrong to use violence?

John Brown's use of violence went against the principles of nonviolent resistance championed by figures like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. Additionally, his actions led to loss of life and did not ultimately achieve his goals. Nonviolent methods have generally been more successful in creating lasting change and garnering support for social justice causes.

Related questions

What militant abolitionist came to symbolize the violence in kansas territory?

John Brown


What abolitionist leader took part in the violence known as bleeding Kansas?

John Brown and his sons.


What did John brown do after bleeding Kansas?

Brown's role in the violence in Kansas helped him raise money for his raid on Harpers Ferry in Virginia in 1859. The raid failed, and Brown was executed, becoming a martyr to the abolitionist cause.


What development was partly responsible for the violence in 1856 know as bleeding kansas?

The Kansas Nebraska act set up the situation leading to Brown and his sons killing people in Lawrence Kansas.


What was the nickname given to the violence led by john brown that erupted in the kansas territory?

Prior to Kansas joining the Union, the Kansas Territory was a hotbed of violence and chaos between anti-slavery and pro-slavery settlers. Kansas was known as Bleeding Kansas as these forces collided over the issue of slavery in the United States. The term "Bleeding Kansas" was coined by Republican Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune.


What was the role of John Brown in the violence that led to ''Bleeding Kansas''?

John Brown and his sons were abolitionists and within Kansas a miniature "civil war" broke out among pro-slavery people and anti-slavery people. John Brown, originally from the East, was a strong believer, that at any cost, slavery could not exist in Kansas. Despite what seems to be overwhelming "evidence" John Brown and his sons were never arrested or prosecuted for the murders he committed in Kansas.


What was John Browns role in the violence that lead to Bleeding Kansas?

John Brown came to the Kansas Territory to fight slavery. In May 1856 John Brown led a group that killed several proslavery settlers near Pottawatomie Creek. In August 1856, Brown and his followers engaged 400 pro-slavery U.S. soldiers in the "Battle of Osawatomie".


Which presidents supported the Kansas-Nebraska act?

i believe it was President Pierce. Because the Kansas Nebraska Act happened before "Bleeding Kansas" led by John Brown. BTW John Brown is a terrorist who deserved hanging, not a fan of John Brown.


Was Chris brown raised in domestic violence?

yes


Why was John Brown wrong to use violence?

John Brown's use of violence went against the principles of nonviolent resistance championed by figures like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. Additionally, his actions led to loss of life and did not ultimately achieve his goals. Nonviolent methods have generally been more successful in creating lasting change and garnering support for social justice causes.


Why does Lincoln say the union cannot survive half slave and half free?

Because of the violence that erupted because of slavery: see John Brown's raid, nat turner's rebellion, and bleeding kansas Because of the violence that erupted over slavery: see John Brown's raid, Nat Turner's rebellion, and bleeding Kansas. Plus Preston Brookes hit Charles Sumner with a cane in congress for insulting slave owners. Then southerners sent Preston Brookes new canes to replace the one he ruined beating sumner.


Linda brown grew up where?

Linda brown grew up in Kansas Topeka