The Old Testament writers, using the standard procedure of their time, simply stated that an event from historical times occurred in a particular year of the reign of a king of either Israel or Judah. For earlier traditions, they merely stated that a person lived to a particular age, sometimes adding that a son was born when his father was a certain number of years old. There was no standard calendar.
The northern kingdom, Israel, was culturally different in a number of ways from the southern kingdom of Judah. One difference that can result in minor errors in understanding biblical dates is that the scribes of Judah counted the regnal years of their kings from the month Tishri (September - October), while the scribes in Israel apparently reckoned the regnal years of their kings from the month Nisan (March - April). Also, the scribes of Israel used the Egyptian nonaccession-year ("postdating") system in reckoning the reigns of their kings from the division of the kingdom down to 798 BCE, and the Babylonian accession-year ("antedating") system from that year onward. Judah must have employed the accession-year system for their kings, except during the period when the northern kingdom dominated Judah 848-796 BCE.
According to the nonaccession-year system, that portion of a year which followed a king's accession to the throne and which preceded the official New Year (whether Tishri 1 or Nisan 1) was counted as his first official year. According to the accession-year system, that initial period was called his accession year, and not until after the New Year did his first official year begin.
Esther, for one. It is not quoted nor aluded to in any of the New Testament writers.
Some of the stores of the Old Testament date to about 5,000 years before the occurrences of the New Testament. Others are more recent, but still hundreds of years before the events of the New Testament. The Bible Christians use today was assembled about 300 AD. This would make the answer to the question about 5,300 years between the oldest parts of the old Testament and assembly of the New Testament with the Old Testament to make the Christian bible.
Out of 39 books in the Old Testament Jesus quoted from 16 books. See related links. All but 9 are quoted by other New Testament writers.
Much of the reason for events and doctrine taught in the New Testament are to be found in the Old Testament. The New Testament would be incomprehensible without the Old. The reason for Christ's coming to earth and why humankind are in need of salvation can be found in the Old Testament, particularly in Genesis.
Matthew's Gospel contains more refereences to the Old Testament than any other New Testament book. Sometimes the author pointed to the Old Testament as prefiguring events in his Gospel, sometimes he would just write passages that reflected Old Testament passages and let the discerning reader find the parallel passage in the Old Testament. He wanted his Gospel to be seen as the successor to the Hebrew scriptures.
Yes, the Old testament was quite avaliable to the New Testament writers.
A:The Old Testament authors lived before the time of Jesus and his disciples, and could not have imagined the events of the first century. They did not know about, nor could they have foreseen the disciples.
The New Testament writers believed that God's word was inspired and authoritative. They saw their own writings as a means to convey God's message and teachings to others. They sought to faithfully communicate the message of Jesus Christ and the principles of the Christian faith through their writings.
Some of the stores of the Old Testament date to about 5,000 years before the occurrences of the New Testament. Others are more recent, but still hundreds of years before the events of the New Testament. The Bible Christians use today was assembled about 300 AD. This would make the answer to the question about 5,300 years between the oldest parts of the old Testament and assembly of the New Testament with the Old Testament to make the Christian bible.
Esther, for one. It is not quoted nor aluded to in any of the New Testament writers.
The Old Testament cannot be considered a reliable historical document. It is therefore impossible to date any of the alleged events contained within it.
The Qur'an is actually quite different from the Old Testament and reads more like a commentary on the events of the Old Testament than a retelling of those events. There are some details in the Qur'an's retelling that differ from the Old Testament's. Most clearly different is that in the Old Testament, Abraham moves to sacrifice Isaac, but in the Qur'an he moves to sacrifice Ishmael.
Which events happened in what order
Some of the stores of the Old Testament date to about 5,000 years before the occurrences of the New Testament. Others are more recent, but still hundreds of years before the events of the New Testament. The Bible Christians use today was assembled about 300 AD. This would make the answer to the question about 5,300 years between the oldest parts of the old Testament and assembly of the New Testament with the Old Testament to make the Christian bible.
There are about 30 different original writers of Old Testament (consists of 39 books) starting from Moses. These writers wrote by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit as God is the author of the Bible.Another Answer:There is only ONE author of the entire Bible - that is the Word of God - Jesus Christ who spoke all that His Father told Him to. There are many 'writers' in the Old Testament which in its original form consisted of 22 Books.
Out of 39 books in the Old Testament Jesus quoted from 16 books. See related links. All but 9 are quoted by other New Testament writers.
Much of the reason for events and doctrine taught in the New Testament are to be found in the Old Testament. The New Testament would be incomprehensible without the Old. The reason for Christ's coming to earth and why humankind are in need of salvation can be found in the Old Testament, particularly in Genesis.