he described it as being as tho firing a bullet of a gun forward only for it to turn around and head back the other way
to see what gold foil looks like in rutherford nj, or in rutherford b hayes beard
hai
In Rutherford's model of the atom the electrons had a circular motion around the nucleus. By the laws of physics, if something is going in a circular motion then it must be accelerating and a particle that accelerates is losing energy. This means that the electrons that are revolving around the nucleus would eventually fall into the nucleus. Nucleus would eventually collapse. This does not happen therefore the Rutherford model was put aside.
ernest Rutherford
Scientists make observations about the natural world through experiments and try to explain the phenomena that they observe. Scientists then attempt to explain the occurence of all of these observations in an overarching theory. For example, an observation would be seeing an apple fall to the ground and making measurements. The next step would be taking all of these observations which could include things such as the movement of planets and other cosmic bodies to form the theory of gravity which attempts to explain these observations.
to see what gold foil looks like in rutherford nj, or in rutherford b hayes beard
Most of the particles went through the foil, but some were deflected
Observation.
Forming a hypothesis - to explain the observation.
That is true. Science tries to make sense of what is observed, to explain the universe in which we live. Until you make an observation, there is nothing to explain.
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
Bohr model explain these spectra.
I have no clue
An observation.
You must observe to explain.
By observation (and by knowing "everything").
hai