0
Using the benchmark date of 1808, Napoleon's armies grew in size and were clearly larger than armies in the US Civil War. Perhaps only the forces commanded by General Grant in the Overland campaign can be considered comparable. There Grant's army in Virginia was over 100,000 troops. With that said, Napoleon commanded huge armies. He had 170,00 troops at Wargram, 120,000 at Dresden, and 190,000 at Leipzig.
What else can I help you with?
What was the life expectancy for men and women during the civil war?
I don't think they had statistics for those issues. Even within the armies, it would be difficult, because there was no systematic way of counting heads. Nobody really knows the numbers of troops deployed in any of the armies.
The code napoleon was set of civil laws the outline?
To set punishments for those who didn't believe in high military and dictatorship (: I love you Dustin
Who had delays during the civil war?
The most sigificant delays were those caused by General Halleck when appointed as Commander-in-Chief of the Union armies in 1862. By wanting to occupy territory instead of destroying enemy forces, he prevented Grant from wiping out the Confederate armies in Tennessee, when it was well within his power.
What were three main advantages for the north over the south?
A much larger population from which to raise armies, a vastly larger industrial capacity with which to supply those armies, several times the amount of railroad mileage upon which to transport those armies and supplies to the battle fronts
Which would win in a military battle ancient Egypt or ancient rome?
Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.
Where can I compare digital camera prices online?
You can compare those at ebay.com
Why did Napoleon Bonaparte take command of the Army of Italy?
Those were his orders.
What was the effect when The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed?
Germany had armies fighting in Russia when the treaty was signed. By ending the war there, Germany was able to move most of those armies to France to bolster those already fighting there. It also removed Russia from the war, allowing them to fight their Civil War with less interference from the Central Powers. It would've granted large amounts of territory to the Central Powers, but the later treaty of Versailles forced them to repudiate the treaty.
How do their areas triangles compare?
I'll be happy to help you, but in order for me to compare the areas of those triangles, you have to tell me the areas of those triangles.
Why was it such a huge mistake for Civil War generals to adhere to Napoleon Bonaparte's famous military?
It was a huge mistake because they were still so imbibed of Napoleon's strategical and tactical principles to not realize the great evolution the new technologies (rifled weaponry, railroads etc.) in being would have brought about both in tactics and strategy. Only after the early stage of war they became aware that those principles had become obsolete and they slowly provided to change their minds but at the cost of huge losses in terms of men and means.
Are battles arranged or do they just happen when 2 armies cross?
Both of those can happen.
How The German War of Liberation affects Napoleon?
What German war of liberation in the time of Napoleon ? Those German states which were not allied to Napoleon, principally Prussia, were treated savagely by the Jena/Auerstadt campaign of 1806 and in the subsequent treaty.
