0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What kinds of evidence do archaeologists anthropologists and paleontologists study to find out how prehistoric people lived?
ruins mostly.
What evidence found by archaeologists that Sumerians were not prehistoric?
a a a
Why do historians need archaeologists and anthropologists to study?
This is because history is the study of the written past, while prehistory is the study of the unwritten past. Archaeologists find their answers from material which is found in the ground, and anthropologists find their answers by trying to match the human behaviour of some societies with the evidence that the archaeologists found.
Have archaeologists found evidence that the minotaur lived?
not exactly but greek stories MAY link to where u can find evidense of minotaur.
What is a sentence for archaeologists?
archaeologists have found very shocking evidence. Where do archaeologists work?
How do archaeologists look for evidence about early people?
they do observations
What evidence found by archaeologists shows that sumerians were not prehistoric?
a a a
What evidence did discoveries by the Leakey's and other archaeologists provide?
Paleontological and archeological evidence about hominid evolution.
What evidence do archaeologists have about china's history?
China 's history?
What evidence is there for language use among early hominids?
Evidence for language use among early hominids includes the presence of a descended larynx, which is important for producing a wide range of vocal sounds, as well as the discovery of symbolic artifacts like cave paintings and figurines. Additionally, studies of the brain structure of early hominids suggest an increased capacity for language processing. Archaeological findings of complex tools and evidence of social cooperation also support the idea that early hominids likely communicated through some form of language.
Who are the experts who told us about the past?
Archaeologists, geologists and geographers find evidence that tells us of the past. Historians record events that become the past.
Why do archaeologists sometimes disagree about how to interpret archaeological evidence?
Archaeologists may disagree about interpreting archaeological evidence due to several reasons. Firstly, interpretation often relies on fragmentary and incomplete evidence, leading to multiple plausible interpretations. Secondly, archaeologists have differing theoretical perspectives, which can influence their interpretations. Lastly, biases, personal perspectives, and subjective opinions can also contribute to disagreements among archaeologists when interpreting the past.
