Contemporary assumptions about women as nurturing and morally upright influenced Dickens to often portray female workers as virtuous and victimized. This helped evoke sympathy from readers and serve as a commentary on societal injustices faced by women in his time. However, this also limited his portrayals by reinforcing traditional gender roles and overlooking the agency and diversity of women's experiences.
The assumption that Theory X and Theory Y about workers influences management styles. The assumptions of these two theories differ from employee motivation as well as satisfying employees' needs.
The assumptions that define participative management is involvement of all workers. This means that even employees will give the ideas on how to run a firm.
Charles Dickens likely refers to the workers in the factory as "hands" to dehumanize them and emphasize their alienation and exploitation. By reducing them to mere body parts used for labor, Dickens highlights the mechanical and impersonal nature of the industrial system that treats workers as disposable tools.
The term "hands" is derived from people who did physical work (e.g. farm "hands")
low-paid workers and their families
Charles Dickens was critical of factory towns, particularly in his novel "Hard Times," where he portrayed them as bleak, oppressive places that dehumanized workers and exploited their labor. He highlighted the harsh working conditions, social inequalities, and lack of compassion for the workers in these industrial settings. Dickens believed that factory towns were emblematic of the negative impact of rapid industrialization on society.
Sturdy
Sister Carrie
During Dickens' time, common jobs included factory workers, domestic servants, agricultural laborers, miners, and tradespeople such as blacksmiths and cobblers. There were also jobs in the growing industries like railroad workers, clerks, and shopkeepers. Additionally, professions such as doctors, lawyers, and clergy members were prevalent in society.
The answer would be Access Privileges.
It described the clothes middle class workers wore.
Coworkers and analysts described D'Alessandro as a passionate, nontraditional manager who rewarded his employees for innovative ideas, honesty, and integrity.