0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the attitudes of renaissance thinkers differ from those of medieval scholars?
Renaissance thinkers emphasized humanism, individualism, and the importance of secular knowledge and classical learning. In contrast, medieval scholars focused on theology, Scholasticism, and faith-based understanding of the world. Renaissance thinkers sought to explore and understand the natural world through observation and reason, while medieval scholars relied more heavily on faith and religious teachings.
How did the northern humanist differ from those of italian humanists?
Northern humanists were more focused on religious reform and education, while Italian humanists were more interested in classical literature and art. Northern humanists often emphasized the importance of vernacular languages and the Bible, whereas Italian humanists were more concerned with the revival of Greco-Roman culture. Overall, northern humanists had a more religiously influenced perspective compared to the secular approach of Italian humanists.
How did the Renaissance scholar's differ from those of medieval scholar's?
Renaissance scholars focused on humanism, individualism, and a revival of classical learning and culture, while medieval scholars were more centered on theology, scholasticism, and religious teachings. Renaissance scholars were more interested in the arts, literature, and science, while medieval scholars focused on deciphering and interpreting religious texts and doctrines.
How does it differ from the methods used by scholars in medieval rimes?
How does what differ? This question needs to be rewritten.
How did erasmus differ from Italian renaissance scholars?
gays
How did the humanist mindset differ from the medieval mindset?
Humanist scholars influenced more than just literature. With their independent thinking, they began to challenge long-accepted traditions, assumptions and institutions. As they made all sorts of unsettling discoveries, it further validated their desire to challenge and question nearly every thing.
How did thinkers of the renaissance and the enlightenment differ in their beliefs about faith and reaon?
Thinkers of the Renaissance tended to emphasize a balance between faith and reason, seeing them as complementary paths to truth. In contrast, Enlightenment thinkers prioritized reason over faith, promoting the idea that human reason and scientific inquiry were the most reliable paths to knowledge and progress.
How did the intellectual endeavors of medieval scholars differ before and after 1000?
Before the year 1000, the medieval scholars were concerned with Y1K. Afterwards they all got drunk and forgot about it for the next 997 years.
How did the renaissance differ from the european middle ages?
Renaissance means rebirth and ended the Middle Ages. After a 1000 years man produced art, massive churches, and began to think in humanist ways.
How did the power of popes and kings differ during medievil times?
The pope thought they should choose the bishops since they had the power of God, while the king thought that kings should choose the bishop since God had chosen the king and thought the popes had too much power.
How did renaissance scholars differ from those of medieval scholars?
Renaissance scholars focused more on studying classical texts and humanism, valuing reason, individuality, and critical thinking. They sought to understand the world through observation and experimentation, promoting the spread of knowledge through books and printing press. In contrast, medieval scholars were primarily interested in theology, relying on religious teachings and authority for knowledge.
How did this differ from the view of many liberal thinkers?
Many liberal thinkers emphasize individual rights and freedoms, often prioritizing personal liberty and equality. They tend to advocate for a more active government role in addressing social inequalities and ensuring the well-being of all citizens. In contrast, this perspective may focus more on individual responsibility and limited government intervention in economic and social affairs.
