The Romans did not have inferior technology. They had superb engineering.
No, Greek technology was not similar Roman technology. Rome might have had one Greek technology that they used, but other then that one Greek technology, Roman technology was not similar to Greek technology.
Roman culture and language was inferior to that of the Greeks.
What???
The expansion in the number of conquered people did not affect Rome's expansion because it was the product of her expansion.
Yes. Rome's army
they failed to invent machines and it led to not able to provide growing population.
It is basically bad technology. Inferior is the opposite of superior, so inferior is worse.
No, Greek technology was not similar Roman technology. Rome might have had one Greek technology that they used, but other then that one Greek technology, Roman technology was not similar to Greek technology.
Roman culture and language was inferior to that of the Greeks.
How did Rome's location affect its development
An attack on communism, and on the inferior Slav people, with the certainty of winning against a backward country with inferior technology.
Claudius was Roman emperor between 44 A.D. and 54 A.D. while Nero was emperor of Rome between 54 A.D. and 66 A.D.Roman technology affected the 50s by improving transportation, sanitation and the military.Did you mean to ask how technology affected the 1950s?
it affected Rome by giving them chrisianity
What???
iugblhjkuijkk
Rome gained ascendancy in the Western Mediterranean.
How did Rome's location affect its development