answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Landowners looked down on those who had made their fortunes in the "vulgar" business world. Not until late in the 1800s were rich entrepreneurs considered the social equals of the lords of the countryside.
The changes that industrialization brought about for the large landowners and aristocrats was dwindling power and respect due to the amassing of wealth by merchants,factory owners, and investment bankers.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Looked down on them because they made income in "vulgar" business world.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The wealthy members of the middle class were looked down upon by the landowners and aristocrats.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did landowners and aristocrats view wealthy members of the middle class?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History
Related questions

How did land owners view wealthy members of the middle class?

If they were wealthy they were not middle class.


What Changes did Industrialization bring to lower middle class of factory overseers and skilled workers?

Middle Class grew during the Industrial Revolution, skilled workers, professionals, business people, wealthy farmers, factory owners, shippers, merchants, factory owners, merchants and bankers grew wealthier than the landowners, and the aristocrats.


How were large landowners different in Japan and Western Europe in the Middle Ages?

they hug the large landowners different


Is Australia wealthy or middle class?

Its not to wealthy


Who were the aristocrats of early rome?

In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.In very early Rome the patricians were the aristocrats. In time, the plebeians gained status and they joined the ranks of the aristocracy. In considering ancient Rome, you have to remember its long history and many social changes that occurred over the years.


After the American revolution state legislatures were composed of?

Significantly more middle-class representatives and fewer wealthy members compared to before the war.


Why did tyrants replace aristocrats as rulers of the city state?

The tyrants replaced the aristocrats as rulers of the city-states. Aristocrats are members of rich and powerful families and ruled most city states. A middle class of merchants and artisans developed, wanting a say in government. Gradually, strength in cities shifted from aristocrats to merchants and artisans. As a result, aristocratic government was replaced by rulers called tyrants. <---- this was an essay question on one of my tests in 6th grade- I got an A :) !


Was every Pioneer poor?

No, first, Aristocrats controlled the land. They were not poor, but wealthy or from wealthy families. Second, many settlers had money. Third, even poor settlers saved money. However, there were certainly many poor, ill, infirm, etc. and we have always had at least 3 economic classes, poor, middle, and rich.


Who was introduced Bourgeois Type Of Society?

It was Karl Marx who introduced the bourgeoisie type of society. The term 'bourgeoisie' was used to refer to the wealthy middle class members of society in the latter part of the Middle Ages.


Which group did the bourgeoisie belong to?

This group was made up of the middle class of the French. Mainly the 3rd class. The 1st class was Priests while the 2nd class was made up of Nobles and wealthy landowners. 3rd class were wealthy peasants and the bourgeoisie.


Who originally had control of the towns in the middle ages?

The Landowners/Kings or tghey're baylifs


Was Martin van Buren wealthy?

No. His family was middle class,definitely not wealthy.