It stated that humans are evil and need to be controlled using law in order to prevent chaos. They want to bring Law and Order to prevent chaos.
Legalism suggested that society should be controlled through strict laws and harsh punishment. It promoted the use of strict rules and severe penalties to maintain social order and obedience to the government. Legalists believed that a strong central authority was necessary to govern and ensure stability in society.
Yes, involving civil society in the lawmaking process can enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of laws by representing diverse perspectives and promoting public participation in democratic governance. This can lead to more inclusive and comprehensive legislation that better aligns with the needs and values of society as a whole.
Slavery is a heinous violation of human rights and dignity. It has no place in any society and should be universally condemned and eradicated.
Rousseau believed that citizens should be the authors of society's laws because it promotes the general will and common good of the people. By having a direct say in the laws that govern them, citizens are more likely to feel a sense of ownership and responsibility for their society, leading to a more just and equitable system. This also helps prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or groups.
Without laws, there would be no clear guidelines on how businesses should operate. This could lead to unfair competition, exploitation of workers, lack of consumer protection, and environmental damage. Overall, it would create a chaotic and unstable business environment that could harm both businesses and society.
No, killing someone is illegal and considered a crime regardless of the circumstances. It is important to prioritize safety and seek help in such situations, such as contacting the authorities or seeking support from a counselor.
sOCIALISM
To suggest how society should work.
To suggest how society should work.
The philosophy that taught that government should pass strict laws and enforce them with harsh punishment is known as Legalism. Legalism was an ancient Chinese philosophy that emphasized the use of strict laws and severe punishments to maintain social order and obedience to authority.
US
Patriarchy is a social system where men hold primary power and dominate in roles of leadership, authority, and privilege. It often results in the oppression and marginalization of women and other genders. This system perpetuates gender inequality and reinforces traditional gender norms and stereotypes.
Socrates suggests that philosopher-kings, individuals who possess wisdom and knowledge, should rule over society in Plato's "The Republic." He believed that these rulers would govern with the best interest of the community in mind, striving for justice and the common good.
Resentment against the legalist system in China. Confucianism was semi-strict in certain areas where rather relaxed in others whereas Legalism thought human nature was evil and all aspects should be controlled with severe punishment. After one of the dynasties (can't remember which one) ruled using Legalism the resentment fueled more people to convert to Confucianism.
The philosophy that taught a government should pass strict laws and use harsh punishments is called Legalism. Legalism originated in China during the Warring States period and emphasized the importance of strong central authority for maintaining social order and stability.
== ==
CONFUCIANISM- The 5 relationships -Ruler to Subject -Father to Son -Husband to Wife -Older to Younger brother -Friend to Friend LEGALISM- Founder, Core Ideas -Han Fe Zi (Most famous writer) 6th century -Harmony exists in the state only when the lawful ruler imposes it. -Punishment is useful to maintain order -Ideas should be monitored and controlled DAOISM- Founder -Lao Zi Ca 6th century B.C. ( The Way of Virtue)
Censorship should be used selectively and only in cases where the content is harmful or dangerous, such as promoting violence or hate speech. In a democratic society, individuals should have the freedom to choose what they want to read or watch. A balanced approach that considers both freedom of expression and protection of society is ideal.