0
How did leisure time for poor families differ from wealthy families?
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What statements best describes a differences between the wealthy and the poor in Great Britain during the Industrial Revolution?
The wealthy were able to enjoy a great deal of leisure time, while the poor worked extremely long hours each week.
How did the lives of poor sumerians compare to the lives of the wealthy?
the poor families worked at a young age to earn money
How did living conditons of the the wealthy differ from those of the poor?
The wealthy lived in larger homes or mansions with more amenities, like servants, running water, and electricity, while the poor often lived in cramped, unsanitary conditions with limited access to clean water and proper sanitation. The wealthy had better access to education, healthcare, and leisure activities, while the poor struggled to meet their basic needs. Economic and social disparities were significant between the two groups.
What was daily life like for roman women describe two differences that existed between women who were wealthy and those who were poor?
The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.
How where boys of wealthy Athenian families educated?
The rich got richer and the poor got poorer
Was every Pioneer poor?
No, first, Aristocrats controlled the land. They were not poor, but wealthy or from wealthy families. Second, many settlers had money. Third, even poor settlers saved money. However, there were certainly many poor, ill, infirm, etc. and we have always had at least 3 economic classes, poor, middle, and rich.
Is Honduras poor or wealthy?
it is poor
Who held the political power in early Roman Republic?
In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run. In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run. In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run.
Was Pieter Brueghel wealthy or poor?
he lived regularly not to wealthy nor too poor
How did children in Victorian times live through the poor times and the rich times?
Children in the Victorian times were most often happy with what they had because they had no comparison. They lived in homes with their families when they were wealthy or in crowded rooming houses if they were not as wealthy. They often had to work with their families in order to make ends meet.
In the middle ages who started schools?
In the middle ages only the wealthy were able to go to school. Poor kids had to go to work to support their families.
Was Giles Corey wealthy or poor?
he was poor
