The wealthy lived in larger homes or mansions with more amenities, like servants, running water, and electricity, while the poor often lived in cramped, unsanitary conditions with limited access to clean water and proper sanitation. The wealthy had better access to education, healthcare, and leisure activities, while the poor struggled to meet their basic needs. Economic and social disparities were significant between the two groups.
In social Darwinism, the upper class and wealthy individuals were often seen as having the most social value. This perspective was based on the belief that those who were successful and wealthy had proven their superiority through survival of the fittest, and therefore had a greater contribution to society.
Social Darwinism is the belief that only the strongest individuals or societies will survive and prosper, and therefore, the wealthy are seen as the fittest and most deserving of their wealth. This concept was used by the wealthy to justify their status and wealth by arguing that it was a result of their superior abilities and hard work, while those who were poor or struggling were seen as weak and inferior.
In 1945, social class was still heavily stratified, with a clear distinction between the upper, middle, and lower classes. The upper class consisted of the wealthy elite, while the middle class typically included professionals and skilled workers. The lower class was made up of manual laborers and those living in poverty. Social mobility was limited, with individuals often remaining in the class they were born into.
By those living in big cities, Everett is considered a small town.
This phrase suggests that society often views behaviors differently based on a person's wealth status. It implies that behaviors considered eccentric in wealthy individuals may be labeled as crazy or abnormal in those who are poor. It reflects a societal bias toward overlooking or excusing certain behaviors in the wealthy while stigmatizing similar behaviors in the poor.
Parker Lee
Also, life for those living in poverty was very hard, but life for the wealthy was very nice and at-ease.
They are alive. They move, breathe, make waste and reproduce themselves. Dead or non living doesn't do any of those. Living thing needs and uses energy.
Independent living offers housing for those who need little or no help. Assisted living provides a sliding scale of support including medication management and some housekeeping.
Conditons were horrible. Those that could work, were worked to death. The rest were given no water. no plumbing. no beds, no food, and no clothes. They were taken to what they were told was a shower and they were gassed to death. Their bodies were burned and even the gold from their teeth was removed.
Poor, unsuccessful, failing, or destitute. Those words mean wealthy.
how do the limbs of a pig differ markedly from those of humans?
Food sources for Native Americans of the northwest differed from those of the Native Americans living in the west and southwest because those in the northwest had plenty of seafood. They were able to supplement the meat that they hunted, and the vegetables they grew with fish, and shellfish.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
No, only those who are wealthy and have a proper upbringing
How do colonies on the surface of a pour plate differ from those suspended in the agar?
The arteries of the pulmonary circulation differ from those of the systemic circulation in that they carry?