0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the time line used in the story 'The Necklace'?
The time line is a ten year period. The story begins with the necklace being borrowed and lost and ends ten years later when Mme Loisel meets Mme Forestier after the Loisel's spent ten years paying off the loan they took out to pay for the replacement necklace.
What is the moral of the story of the necklace?
The moral lesson is be honest with people when you have lost their necklace and be thankful for what you have!A person should not be so proud as to pretend to be someone in a higher station in life than he or she really is. If Mme. Loisel had not pretended to be a person of higher status, she would not have borrowed the necklace. By all means, become such a person, but do not pretend. Also, dishonesty will likely lead to regrettable consequences. Had Mme. Loisel been honest about losing the necklace, she would not have had to pay such a high price to replace it.
What is the conclusion in the story The Necklace by Guy De Maupassant?
The conclusion of "The Necklace" reveals that the necklace Madame Loisel borrowed was actually a fake, not the expensive piece of jewelry she thought it was. This realization plunges Madame Loisel and her husband into poverty as they spend years working to repay the debt incurred to replace the necklace, only to discover its true value at the end. The story highlights the theme of appearances versus reality and the consequences of pride and vanity.
What surprises Madame Loisel when she tells her friend the truth in the story the necklace?
Madame Loisel's friend tells her that the necklace she borrowed was a fake, not real diamonds. This revelation surprises Madame Loisel because she had spent years working to pay off a real diamond necklace that she thought she had lost.
How does madame loisel change over the ten years she works to pay off the cost of the necklace?
Madame Loisel changes from being materialistic and discontent to being humble and hardworking. She learns the value of hard work and the importance of being grateful for what she has. By the end of the ten years, she becomes a more mature and appreciative person.
Which choice is a conclusion based on the excerpt The Necklace?
The conclusion based on the excerpt "The Necklace" is that material possessions alone do not determine one's happiness or social status. The story demonstrates that appearances can be deceiving and that true value lies in personal qualities and relationships.
What is the ending of the short story the necklace?
Mathilde goes up to Mme. Forstier after 10 years of saving money to pay back for the necklace. Mme. Forstier doen't recognize her at first and Mathilde tells Mme. Forstier what she went through to pay her debt. Ironically, Mme. Forstier tells Mathilde that the necklace was fake and worth 500 frances...
What is m loisels job?
M. Loisel is a character in "The Necklace." He is introduced as a clerk working in the Department of Education. After his wife loses an expensive borrowed necklace, he spends the next 10 years working a side job as a bookkeeper and copier to pay off his debt. "The Necklace" was written by Guy de Maupassant.
How did M Loisel contribute to the cost of the new necklace?
Mme. Loisel was forced to forfeit everything of their joy and ease in order to pay back the necklace's purchase price. She and her husband relocated and rented an attic inside a building. She let their servant go in an effort to save costs in any way she could. Without regard for her beauty or charm, Mathilde was forced to handle all the household duties by herself. Every day, she fetched water, washed the dirty clothes, and scrubbed the greasy dishes. She went to the market and haggled with several people to get the best deal possible.
What is the main event in the necklace?
The main event in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant is when Mathilde Loisel loses the borrowed necklace and sacrifices years of her life working to pay for a replacement, only to discover it was actually a worthless imitation. This event leads to the revelation of the necklace's true value and the themes of deception and the consequences of pride.
What is the hyperbole of the necklace?
The hyperbole in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant occurs when Mathilde Loisel exaggerates the importance of her appearance and status. When she borrows a necklace to wear to a fancy party, she believes it will elevate her social standing to that of a wealthy woman, when in reality it leads to her downfall due to the deception and debt it causes.
Who was the antagonist in the short story 'the necklace'?
apart from the lead character"s fatal pride- and one wonders why her Admiral Zsa Zsa Gabor brand of show-offishness- She was Married to Mr. Loisel, right, why did she have come on with all big guns on deck- attracting men at a social outing. I don"t say it is wrong for married women to go to such things as Card Parties ( which brings up another vice- gambling) but it is not well, unless they happen to be hosting the Ball- like the Late Princess Grace- not really proper. Up to a point the original owner of the necklace- MMe Forestier ( forester or maybe Parks) should have told MMe loisel before hand it was only a replica, much misery could have been avoided and a concurrent crash-dive into poverty. sort of Cinderella in Reverse.
