0
Although there are many, by studying the life and times of King Henry VIII will certainly answer your question.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Monarchs justified absolutism by claiming that they possessed a divine right to rule, meaning that their authority came directly from God. They argued that they were chosen to govern and protect their subjects, and that their rule was necessary to maintain order and stability in society. Additionally, some monarchs promoted the idea that they were uniquely qualified to make decisions and provide guidance, as they were believed to possess superior wisdom and knowledge.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What idea were porposed by montesquieu and Locke that contradicted absolutism?
Monarchs In Europe believed in the divine right of kings and absolutism.
What did Rousseau think about absolutism?
He thought it was stupid and that the monarchs had chodes.
How did monarchs justify and maintain the power?
they didnt!
How did monarchs justify and maintain there power in European history?
stuip
The age of absolute monarchs?
The age of absolutism was 1550-1770 CE. During this time period European monarchs established absolute rule based on claims of divine right.
How did absolutism monarchs build power at home and abroad?
Between 1600 and 1721 europeans powers were constantly at war
How Plato justify absolutism?
his perversion of idealism is his absolutism,, when any one tries to enforce his ideals he becomes absolutist......... the dollowing points will show absolutism in Plato's political philosophical; absolutism in his concept of justice, in concept of philosopher ruler, absolutism in his concept of communism of spouse and property, in ideal state which was not practically possible and in his concept of state controled education.
Which of the following properly expresses this belief?
Monarchs during the time of absolutism believed in divine right. which of the following properly expresses this belief?
How did European monarchs justify their positions?
They thought that God had given them the right to rule as they chose.
Why didn't England have absolutism?
Absolutism was only possible in Europe after the sovereigns were able to overcome the local vested power of nobles, through the use of national armies without local agglomeration. However, during the feudal period, English nobles (barons) forced the monarchy to guarantee their legal position with the Magna Carta. As a result, when the English monarchy would finally be militarily capable of asserting absolutism, it was effectively prevented from doing so because of the barons' power in Parliament. Conversely, French, Spanish, Prussian, Austrian, and Russian nobles did not have these protections and lost power as monarchs became more capable of consolidating their power under absolutism.
What is the monarchical rule by enlightenment principles?
Enlightened Absolutism
Can moral absolutism be justifed?
A:Moral absolutism is an ethical view that certain actions are absolutely right or wrong, regardless of other contexts such as their consequences or the intentions behind them. Saint Augustine, who was a famous early proponent of moral absolutism, said that it was not even permissible to tell a lie in order to prevent a great evil such as a murder. He said that by lying to a potential murderer about the whereabouts of his intended victim, we would be condemning ourselves to hell in order to extend someone's stay on earth and perhaps save the potential murderer from hell. On this rather extreme view, moral absolutism is always justified. It has been noted that in later life, Augustine found practical reasons not to follow his own standards, but could always justify his actions without compromising his stated position.Most people would find it difficult to justify moral absolutism. They would say that it is proper to tell a lie not only to avoid a possible murder, but even to avoid unnecessary grief for a bereaved person. It can be justified to assault a person contemplating a serious crime, even though that person is, as yet, innocent of any crime. On this view, moral absolutism is not justified.
