pasture in his famous swan neck experiment proved that life cannot arise spontaneously from non living matter.He prepared meat broth and put it in three separate flasks.He then heated these flask's neck and drawn them in curves TO PREVENT ENTRY OF AIR BORNE MICROBES
A thesis statement is a fact to prove that this is that... your opinion stated as a fact. so as for bigfoot, it would start out as, "Big is real becuase..." or "big foot isn't real becuase...." You need some sort of fact to proove your opinion. though i doubt there is any fact on bigfoot...
A stray calf is a calf that has wandered off away from his mother, and/or has been separated from his mother by either the herd moving to another pasture, or by them being sorted, or simply by the fact that that little calf went exploring a little farther than he should have.
No one can be sure of what type of fish lived during the times of the dinosaurs, in fact no one has ever been able to prove that fish really did exist during those times.
her mother told her to be a scene but not a herd
Opinion
Spontaneous generation was the idea that living thoings could develop directly from non-living materials. (See http://www.biology.clc.uc.edu/courses/bio114/spontgen.htm). Experiments carried out by the French scientist Louis Paeteur provided evidence against this idea. (See http://www.kent.k12.wa.us/staff/TimLynch/sci_class/chap01/pasteur.html).
That is the correct spelling of the verb "prove" (establish as fact).
if it's true
It does not depending on sporophytes generation
The transmission of customs or beliefs from generation to generation, or the fact of being passed on in this way.
You obviously are confusing spontaneous generation with abiogenesis and have an agenda bias.Ever since the synthesis of urea in the early 19th century we have know that life is a physio-chemical process and there is no divide, except to essentialist, between life and nonlife. In point of fact to ask such a question is ill posed.Comment:There is no agenda in the Bible category as they are not the words of any man. No related question in this category is 'ill posed' - begging to differ with you here.definition (now seemingly archaic): spontaneous generation,the hypothetical process by which living organisms develop from nonliving matter (Britannica Ency)Wikipedia - shortened but you will see the drift: Classical notions of abiogenesis, now more precisely known as spontaneous generation,This Wiki states was prevalent in Western thought in 19th Century - hence the 'Age of Englightenment and Evolution category inclusion - no agenda here, I'm sure of it.
Montag could not prove that books were worth preserving and that society was better off with them.
The names for generations are arbitrary and are usually developed after the fact. No agreement has been reached on what the generation following Generation Z might be called.
You can prove a fact is true by looking it up on several Internet sites or a book. When looking up a fact make sure that the source you are using is reputable and well versed in the subject you are looking for. It is also a good idea to cross-reference the fact on several sites.
You would expect a catabolic reaction to be spontaneous because this type of reaction involves the release of energy. You would expect reactions that require energy (anabolic reactions) not to be spontaneous due to the need for an input of energy.
Yes, it does.
Fact