They were not as mobile. The way they hunted was limited without the horse. For the plains Indians, who depended on the buffalo herds could not follow as well without horses. But the biggest difference was how they fought. A lot of the tribes were very peaceful but some were not. The tribes with horses had a huge advantage.
Before the plains indians had horses they hunted buffalo by killing foxes and wrapping up in the fox skin. They did this because the buffalo wasn't scared of the fox due to the fact that it was much bigger than foxes so the plains indians approached them and took them out with their arrows.
hope this helped..
-Jay Marsh
Almost nobody lived on the Great Plains before horses arrived; hunters on foot had no hope of keeping up with the herds or transporting hides and meat from animals they killed.
Many tribes lived on the edges of the Plains and ventured out in the hope of finding a sick or injured animal that could not run away; dogs were used for transporting very small tipis and carrying light burdens, but the chances of success would have been very small.
Even if a small herd was discovered, hunters could not keep up with the animals in order to shoot arrows at them, so in some cases the "buffalo jump" was used - scaring the herd with fire and noise to stampede it over a cliff. The amount of meat, hides and bones produced in this way would be far more than the hunters could use so it was a wasteful and risky business.
The only real hope was in the deep snows of winter when hunters wearing snowshoes could easily track and overtake a small herd of buffalo, who were unable to run in those conditions. Spears could be used instead of arrows and only the amount needed would be taken. Getting the meat back in a deep-frozen condition was simply a matter of dragging it.
In general terms the Plains were virtually empty of people before horses became available.
See links below for images:
they hunted buffalo on foot. they would ambush them. then shoot them with a bow and arrow
The plains Indians are nomads wich means they travel in serch of food before they had horses they had to carry their things them selves they also used dogs.
They traveled on foot
Discount Double Check
I think the Comanche had the horses first?
Nez Perce
No, because there were no horses before the Spanish settlers brought them from Spain.
were skilled too shoot under horses chin
The Sioux traveled by horses, obviously.
"Indian" is not a recognized lifestyle and therefore we can not answer your question.
The most common Indian tribe known for using horses is the Sioux. Many think the Iroquois and Kwakiutl Indian groups also used horses.
"Indian" is not a recognized lifestyle and therefore we can not answer your question.
I think the Comanche had the horses first?
in india
Horses made the Cheyenne more mobile when hunting and the horses were able to carry heavier loads of game.
Horses made the Cheyenne more mobile when hunting and the horses were able to carry heavier loads of game.
Horses made the Cheyenne more mobile when hunting and the horses were able to carry heavier loads of game.
== ==
Before they got horses they mostly ate corn because they were corn farmers. Once they got horses they gave up farming and mostly hunted bison,deer, and elk.
Before cars there were carriages pulled by horses. Before cars there were carriages pulled by horses. Before cars there were carriages pulled by horses.
It was transportation.