With dismay and fear.
Bad.
us did not want to be part of it
Yes.
2
They saw them as monkeys, as was reflected in the white Australia policy.
chamberland Alternative view: actually it was Neville Chamberlain.
I think the main difference is that in WWI, Australia was hardly attacked, but in WWII, there were under attack by the Japanese
world war 2 altered our view on wars being fought with men and tanks, now can be fought with a push of a button. also it made some funky bomb craters filled with corpses and carcasses
WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.WWII which is an abbreviation for World War 2.
Conqueror's viewed subjugated peoples as as 'inferiors."
No you need to do this . Wiki doesn't do summaries let alone from a particular point of view.
yes apocalypse world war 2 is the same as world war 2.