Yes.
'Cause their ships could move around quickly. i agree i love you guys
First of all the Athenians did not win the battle of salamis, the Greeks did and they won because they had smaller and faster Greek ships
They won because of having small easy to maneuver ships
At the Battle of Salamis, the Greek ships were built specifically for fighting at sea, whereas the Persian ships were not, and also the Greeks were much better sailors. The mast and sails were taken down and stowed for fighting, and the ships were maneuvered entirely by the oarsmen. The Persian ships were sunk by ramming them.
Because Salamis was a sea battle, and the Greek side woulld be at a bit of a disadvantage without ships.
This is not known, but with 40 ships lost, perhaps 8,000.
they used jeba ships they tasted nasty because they were jebas
Themistocles.
The Greeks did because they had smaller and faster Greek ships (came right from my social studies book) hope i could help :)
During the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE, the Greeks are estimated to have sunk around 300 Persian ships. This decisive naval battle was a turning point in the Greco-Persian Wars, showcasing the effectiveness of the Greek trireme and the strategic acumen of leaders like Themistocles. The exact number of ships lost can vary in historical accounts, but the Greeks' victory significantly weakened the Persian naval fleet.
Ships were invented prior to written records. Thus, we do not know who invented them. Ships were useful to the Greeks because they allowed travel to various islands and they permitted trade, which would have been far more arduous over land.
Iron clad ships were introduced into battle