'Cause their ships could move around quickly. i agree i love you guys
because my butt
This is not known, but with 40 ships lost, perhaps 8,000.
He had the captains of the Phoenician ships in his fleet, who lost their ships early in the battle, beheaded as an example to the others.
Triremes - three (tri-) banks of oars.
Superior strategy they split the Persian fleet so that a third of it was not present at the battle, so evening up the numbers of ships on either side. Superior tactics - they engaged the Persian fleet when it was strung out coming around an island in the middle of the strait st Salamis.
The Persian fleet comprised mainly of Phoenician, Asian-Greek and Egyptian ships.
First of all the Athenians did not win the battle of salamis, the Greeks did and they won because they had smaller and faster Greek ships
Because Salamis was a sea battle, and the Greek side woulld be at a bit of a disadvantage without ships.
They won because of having small easy to maneuver ships
This is not known, but with 40 ships lost, perhaps 8,000.
The Greeks did because they had smaller and faster Greek ships (came right from my social studies book) hope i could help :)
King Xerxes' fleet of ships from Phonecia, Egypt and Asian-Greeks was defeated at the Battle of Salamis by the Greek fleet led by Spartan Admiral Eurybiades.
At the Battle of Salamis, the Greek ships were built specifically for fighting at sea, whereas the Persian ships were not, and also the Greeks were much better sailors. The mast and sails were taken down and stowed for fighting, and the ships were maneuvered entirely by the oarsmen. The Persian ships were sunk by ramming them.
Triremes, same as the Greeks
Yes.
Wood, with metal fittings and rams.
He had the captains of the Phoenician ships in his fleet, who lost their ships early in the battle, beheaded as an example to the others.
Triremes - three (tri-) banks of oars.