Want this question answered?
It was Orthodox Christianity.
The slaves within the boundaries of the Roman empire had the same religion as the Roman citizens. Slavery was a social class, and the lowest on the ladder. Therefore, being a social class, they would have been influenced culturally the same way as citizens. Slaves were not citizens, but followed what the citizens did. The religion of the Roman empire was paganism, therefore the slaves were as well pagans. The only exception would be people from distant lands who were captured and forced to be slaves; in Asia Minor there would have been Christians and Jews, and those religions spread to the Roman empire; people of all social standings--from slaves to aristocrats--would have converted. But, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that the slaves themselves did not have their own religion.
The people were too interested in their religion
He allowed people within the empire to worship their own religion
Force or try to get all people to follow the Mongol religion. or follow their religion
For the same reason that most people are knighted; for service to the British Empire either culturally, militarily or internationally. In his case, it was culturally.
To be Jewish can mean you either practice the Jewish religion, or are from a Jewish decent. It is both a race and a religion. Someone that is culturally Jewish may not practice the religion, but has a Jewish heritage. Likewise, people that do practice the Jewish religion do not have to be culturally Jewish, or have Jewish ancestors.
He enslaved people who did not share his religion.
A lot of religions. Religion keeps people together and makes them believe that they are one. Religion makes empires strong, no matter what the people believe in. Christianity created the Holy Roman Empire (962-1806). It was a mighty empire that battled against the Middle East and controled much of European during its peak of power. The Muslims had an empire for themselves. The Ottoman Empire (1299-1923) was built on religion as well. It owned a huge amount of land. It was feared by the Europeans during the peak of its power. The Ottoman Empire invaded Christian nations many times and the empire is a big factor for spreading the Muslim beliefs to the world. But almost all the empires are based on religion. The Roman Empire was very much influenced by their religion to dominate the world. So were the Greeks. They both wanted to spread their religions out to the world to dominate. Another empire that was very influenced by its religion were the Aztec Empire. They went to battle many times just to get prisoners to be sacrificed for the Gods.
It was Orthodox Christianity.
The common fear of external threats was the only factor that held the people of Slovaine together.
The slaves within the boundaries of the Roman empire had the same religion as the Roman citizens. Slavery was a social class, and the lowest on the ladder. Therefore, being a social class, they would have been influenced culturally the same way as citizens. Slaves were not citizens, but followed what the citizens did. The religion of the Roman empire was paganism, therefore the slaves were as well pagans. The only exception would be people from distant lands who were captured and forced to be slaves; in Asia Minor there would have been Christians and Jews, and those religions spread to the Roman empire; people of all social standings--from slaves to aristocrats--would have converted. But, basically, what I'm trying to say, is that the slaves themselves did not have their own religion.
People of a certain religion tend to clump up together.
The people were too interested in their religion
He allowed people within the empire to worship their own religion
Christianity was forced upon the people of the Roman empire by the emperor Theodosius I in 380 AD.
There are Christians, Jewish people, atheists, and Muslims currently in Russia.