answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The problems with the rich plebeians were resolved in the 200-year Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians. The problems with the poor plebeians were not resolved.

During the first rebellion of the (poor) plebeian movement (494 BC) the movement created its own leaders, the plebeian tribunes and its own assembly, the plebeian council.

The leaders of the plebeian movement were rich plebeians who wanted to share power with the patricians who monopolised power by monopolising the seats in the senate, the offices of state and the priesthoods.

There were frequent agitations by the plebeian movement which were driven by the economic grievances of the poor plebeians: the abuse of (poor) defaulting debtors by (rich) creditors (large landlords secured labour from the poor peasants through the nexus, debt bondage/slavery) who imprisoned, tortured and sometimes sold as slaves the defaulters; extortionate interest rates on loans; and land shortage for the small peasants who only had allotment-size plots, while the rich landlords appropriated most of the land. The main weapon which was used in these agitations was the refusal to join the levy by the peasant-soldiers or the threat to do so. This was a serious matter because in that period Rome was frequently attacked by neighbouring peoples.

With these agitations the rich plebeians managed to secure new laws which gradually gave them more and more of a share of power. These were:

· The Lex Varleia Horatia de plebiscites (449 BC) which established that bills passed by plebiscites (the resolutions of the plebeian council) carried the force of law and were binding on all roman citizens (including the patricians). However, the bills had to be to be ratified by the senate after the vote.

· Lex Cannuleia de connubio (448 BC) allowed marriage between patricians and plebeians which had been forbidden by table 11.1 of the Law of the Twelve Tables (450 BC).

· The Lex Licinia Sextia (367 BC) opened the office of the consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic and the army) to the plebeians.

· The Lex Publilia (339 BC) also established that the laws passed in the plebiscites carried the force of law and were binding on all Roman citizens (including the patricians) like the Lex Valeria Horatia did.

· The Lex Genucia (342 BC) allowed for both consuls to be plebeian. However, the practice was to have one patrician and one plebeian each year.

· The Lex Olgunia (300 BC) opened the priesthoods to the plebeians.

· The Lex Hortensia (284 BC) reiterated that the bills passed in the plebiscites carried the force of law and were binding on all Roman citizens and established that the bills were to be ratified by the senate before the vote instead of after the vote. This eliminated the major weapon the patrician-controlled senate had to obstruct laws proposed by the plebeian tribunes and passed by the plebeian council.

The Lex Licinia Sextia which gave the plebeian access to the consulship (the consuls were the heads of the Republic) was hard fought. The patricians opposed it and the plebeian tribunes made it impossible to elect any officer of state for five years. Livy called this the years of anarchy. It also took a dictator (an extraordinary officer of state with extraordinary powers who was appointed for six months to deal with emergencies) to force the bill through. Other milestones for the rich plebeians were 356 BC, which saw the first plebeian dictator, 351 BC, which saw the first plebeian censor (the third highest office of state), and 337 which saw the first plebeian praetor (the second highest office of state).

The Lex Hortensia is seen by historians and being the measure which ended the Conflict of the Orders.

At the end of the conflict the rich plebeians were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and were given equestrian (cavalryman) status. This was the lower tier of the aristocracy. The patricians were the higher tier of the aristocracy. At this point the rich plebeians turned their backs on the poor plebeians, whose problems were never dealt with adequately.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The grievances of rich and poor plebeians (the commoners)were different.

At the beginning of the Republic the patricians monopolised political power by monopolising the office of consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic) the seats of the senate and the priesthoods. The rich plebeians were unhappy with this. This does not mean that they lacked civil rights. They enjoyed all the rights conferred by Roman citizenship including the right to vote. They did not lack opportunities for economic advancement either, as they their being rich shows. It was a question of access to the office of consuls and to the senate and of power-sharing with the patricians.

The concerns of the poor plebeians were different. The grievances of the poor were economic. The earliest issue was the abuse of defaulting debtors. Another issue was debt bondage (rich people could secure the labour of the poor by tying them to themselves through locking them into perpetual indebtedness). Lack of land for poor peasants whose plots were hardly enough to make a living also became a grievance.

The first (poor) plebeian rebellion occurred during the Early Republic, in 494 BC, when the patrician-controlled state refused to provide debt defaulters legal protection from abuse by creditors who could imprison them, torture them and sell them as slaves. During this rebellion the poor plebeians started the plebeian movement and created the leaders of their movement (the plebeian tribunes) and their own assembly, the Plebeian Council. This was the beginning of the 200-year Conflict of the Orders (between patricians and plebeians).

The rich plebeians became the leaders of the movement and used the discontent of the poor to press of power-sharing which they obtained, still during the Early Republic. They gained access to the consulship and the other offices of state which were created as the Republic developed, the senate, and some of the priesthoods. They were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and were given equestrian (cavalryman) status and became the lower tier of the aristocracy. At this point they turned the back s on the poor plebeians, whose grievances were not addressed properly.

During the Mid Republic there were not many plebeian agitations. However, by the Late Republic many peasants had lost their land and migrated to Rome to eke out a living. Poverty became a political hot potato. A new breed of wealthy politicians (both patricians and equestrians) who supported the interests of the poor emerged. They were called the populares. Under their leadership, the plebeian movement regained its militantism. Their plight caused agitations and deep conflict and were part of the causes of some of the Roman civil wars of the Late Republic, which brought down the Republic and led to rule by emperors.

.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

It was a coalition of imperial oversight with the Senate - the Princeps pulled strings while the Senate ruled. The Princeps from Augustus onwards had the powers of Tribune of the Plebs (veto), pro-consul (authority outside Rome) and control of the border provinces (where the army was).

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

plebeians did not have enough rights so they protested

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the Roman Empire fix the problem of the Republic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What caused the Middle Ages?

The Middle Ages came about partly because of a decline in literacy and power of the Roman government, starting with the Crisis of the Third Century. These happened in turn largely because of a disastrous series of civil wars that took place during that century, and ongoing wars with the Persians. Another factor leading to the Middle Ages was the division of the Roman Empire into two related empires, the Roman Empire of the West, and the Roman Empire of the East, which was first done in 286 and became permanent in 395. When the Western Empire was attacked by a series of Germanic hordes, the Eastern Empire was too busy to help. The attempts of Diocletian and Constantine to fix things repaired things a bit, but by that time, the Romans were too dependent on German soldiers to control their own destiny. Piece after piece of the Western Empire fell into the control of Germanic kings who established their own kingdoms within the Empire, and more often than not, these kings only gave lip service to their position in the empire. Many historians have dated the Middle Ages to the year 476, when the last Emperor of the West was deposed, and event referred to as the Fall of Rome. The social commercial and literary life of the Empire of the West pretty much collapsed, and did not recover until the Middle Ages were very much under way. There are links to articles on the Decline of the Roman Empire and the Middle Ages below.


The compromise of 1850 did it fix the problem?

blahhh blahhh blahh blahh


Why was the Tsars indifference to the plight of his people a contributing factor to the revolutions of 1917?

One cannot fix the problem unless he knows what the problem is. Indefference is not caring what the problem is, with the consequence of not KNOWING what the problem is.


Who was the first dictator of Ancient Rome?

The term dictator is related to the early Roman state [the Republic]. At the time it did not have any negative meaning: it was just the Roman title given to someone who got complete - and temporary - executive powers in times of emergency. The first man ever to formally carry the Roman title 'dictator' was Titus Lartius Flavus, around 500 BC. The first dictator with the current (negative) meaning of the word was Publius Cornelius Sulla in 212 BC, who used dictatorial powers to do away with his personal enemies; the last one, at least in ancient Rome, was Julius Caesar.


1996 totyota corolla will only start after you've jiggled key why?

It's a simple fix: change the switch that is mounted on the backside of your ignitionlock. Well known problem

Related questions

How did the US fix the weaknesses of the roman republic?

they did not thats why we are in the state we are in


What was the importance of diocletian?

Diocletian was a Roman Emperor who reformed Roman policies to fix the perceived problems of the time. Many of these reforms improved the empire for a time or persisted until the fall of the empire


We _____ trying to fix the problem?

we are still trying to fix the problem


On Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic your screen goes black and stays like that until you turn off your xbox how do you fix that and does anyone else have that problem?

i have never had this problem if you tell me where and when you have this problem i will try to help


How do you fix an itouch?

Depends on the problem. If you want to fix the problem, then find the solution and use the solution to fix it.


How do you fix a Chevy Blazer starting problem?

trying to fix simular problem


What can you do to fix the problem of gay people in the military?

There is no problem of gays in the military, so there is nothing to fix.


How do do fix the problem of trees?

and what problem would that be?


How do you fix xbox 360 non closing tray problem?

YouTube has many videos on how to fix that problem.


Can an ex convict fix his problem?

It depends on what his problem is.


How do you fix my Tumblr problem?

You didnt specify a problem.


How can you fix you memory problem?

just pay someone to fix it