crusaders took too much equipment.
No in the second crusade.
The First Crusade was highly successful, while the Second was not.
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
Well apparently it is called the noble crusade because everyone who went on the first crusade and the noble crusade were noble
it lasted longer
Which one? First crusade - 1095-1099 Second crusade -1145-1148 Third crusade - 1187-1192 Fourth crusade - 1202-1204
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
crusaders took too much equipment
The church encouraged the second crusade by preaching the need to defend the Christian kingdoms in the Holy Land from Muslim forces, promoting the idea that participating in the crusade was a way to gain spiritual merit and forgiveness of sins, and issuing papal bulls to rally support for the crusade and garner participation from European rulers and knights.
The goal of the Second Crusade was to recapture the city of Edessa in the Holy Land, which had been lost to Muslim forces. It was also intended to reinforce the Kingdom of Jerusalem and secure other Christian territories in the region.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.