The US state of Mississippi sought to halt President Johnson from enforcing the Reconstruction Act of 1867 by filing an injunction against it. They claimed the law was unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court rejected their plea.
In 1867 the state of Mississippi sought an injunction to stop US President Johnson's ability to enforce the Reconstruction acts of March, 1867. The state claimed the acts were unconstitutional.The US Supreme Court rejected the plea for the injunction on the grounds that the Court had no legal means to prevent the president from enforcing his "official" duties of enforcing the laws. This case remains a disputed one even today. The case was Mississippi vs. Johnson.
President Andrew Johnson's attorney general was Henry Stanbery. He successfully defeated the state of Mississippi suit in 1867. Mississippi had sought an injunction to prevent Johnson from enforcing several reconstruction acts.
4 parts of reconstruction act of 1867
4 parts of reconstruction act of 1867
The Reconstruction Act of 1867 was introduced by President Andrew Johnson.
in 1867
Between 1867 and 1877, the so-called Radical Republicans enforced changes in the governments of the former Confederate states through military occupation, enforcement of abolition, and enacting state laws that tried to give freed slaves more political power.
Between 1867 and 1877, the so-called Radical Republicans enforced changes in the governments of the former Confederate states through military occupation, enforcement of abolition, and enacting state laws that tried to give freed slaves more political power.
The Congress, in March 1867
1867
Congress passed the Reconstruction Act of 1867
March 2, 1867