Want this question answered?
as we know during experiments, we cant go with or have the actual accuracy requried same here heads are not properly maintaied constant during exeperment.
The whole purpose of physics is to describe the real world, the actual world we live in. Now, you can imagine all sorts of interesting worlds, with different physical laws; but ultimately, you can only know which of these most closely matches the real world, by doing actual experiments.
An experimental physicist also has hypotheses and theories, but they devise actual experiments to show these hypotheses are true (or not).General Relativity is one example where it is shown true by both mathematics and by experiments. The latest experiment to show General Relativity is true is the satellite "Gravity Probe B", which orbited the earth (still is) for a couple of years gathering data on what's called "frame dragging" -- which is a prediction from General Relativity math that had not been shown by experiment (until now).
Aristotle didn't use the word "acceleration," but he did state (incorrectly) that heavier bodies fell faster to the surface of the Earth than did lighter bodies. The poet-philosopher Lucretius MAY have reached a different conclusion, but certainly did no experiments. Writings prior to Galileo Galilei state that Aristotle had been shown to be wrong, but give no details. Dutch scientist Simon Stevin did actual experiments in 1586 with dropped balls and proved conclusively that Aristotle was wrong. However, he also did not use the word "acceleration." Galileo did a mathematical description of balls rolling down a plane, and showed that such bodies experienced constant acceleration. He then speculated that objects falling straight down would do the same. There is no credible evidence that he did any experiments on such objects, as he did not have the instruments to accurately measure their rate of falling.
the real image is reverse of the actual specimen.
whats the meaning accurately expected results and actual results
Controlling
D. Interpreting Results
Actual results divided by your expected results. Subtract that number from 1. Multiply that by 100. For example: Actual result : 9 grams Expected result: 10 grams 9/10 = .9 1 - .9 = .1 .1 x 100 = 10 10% error.
Depending on whether you subtract actual value from expected value or other way around, a positive or negative percent error, will tell you on which side of the expected value that your actual value is. For example, suppose your expected value is 24, and your actual value is 24.3 then if you do the following calculation to figure percent error:[percent error] = (actual value - expected value)/(actual value) - 1 --> then convert to percent.So you have (24.3 - 24)/24 -1 = .0125 --> 1.25%, which tells me the actual is higher than the expected. If instead, you subtracted the actual from the expected, then you would get a negative 1.25%, but your actual is still greater than the expected. My preference is to subtract the expected from the actual. That way a positive error tells you the actual is greater than expected, and a negative percent error tells you that the actual is less than the expected.
False
Marketing control is the process of taking actions or steps to bring the desired results and actual result closer. Many a times actual marketing results deviate from the expected results due to the change in the government regulation or change in competitors strategy and likewise. An efficient and effective marketing control system can help in detecting such deviations and take suitable and appropriate measures to control them.
True Apex ;)
false
However, if there is a material difference between the expected and actual balance, the auditor will investigate this difference further. At this point the auditor will develop an explanation for the difference.
The expected outcome is Profit. But, the actual outcome may be different if the stock selected was poor.
The answer is it is a result that is real