In the beginning, the Roman attitude toward women's roles in society was much like that of the Greeks. Roman males believed that the weakness of females made it necessary for women to have male guardians. The paterfamilias, or male head of the household, had the responsibility for guardianship. Fathers also arranged the marriages of their daughters. By the second century A.D., the paterfamilias no longer had absolute authority over his children, and the husband's absolute authority over his wife also disappeared. By the late second century, women were no longer required to have guardians. Upper-class Roman women had considerable freedom and independence. They had the right to own, inherit, and sell property. They were not segregated from males in the home, like Greek wives. Rather, they were appreciated as enjoyable company and were at the center of household social life. Outside their homes, upper-class women could attend races, the theater, and events in the amphitheater. In the latter two places, however, they were forced to sit in separate female sections. Women could not participate in politics, but a number of important women influenced politics through their husbands.
they somehow go rights?
yes
be more specific
An important difference between greek and Romans attitudes was that
somehow
it gave the slaves more rights and it showed then not to have attitudes or they will get sent to a different harsher state.
Cause they want to change there attitudes
yes
f86666666
What is russian attitudes toward democracy?
In medieval times, Jews were utterly mistreated.
people started to figure out slavery was not right
Attitudes toward learning changed in a positive direction during the Renaissance. Many people actually wanted to learn during this time period.
In medieval times, Jews were utterly mistreated.
describe Americans attitudes toward unconventional activism
True
some attitudes of workers toward themselves that they have less motivation .
they have positive attitudes