answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The battle marked the death knell for wooden ships in the naval services of the world.
The epic battle between the ironclad CSS Virginia (formerly the steam frigate USS Merrimack) and the USS Monitor made history not simply because ironclads were involved, but rather because it was the first engagement between two ironclads. The outcome of the battle is generally considered to have been a draw, although Monitor was firing solid shot throughout and designer John Ericsson was reportedly furious that Monitorhad not been supplied with explosive shells, which he was sure would have sunk Virginia had they been employed by firing at Virginia’s waterline. As it was, Monitor probably did more overall damage to Virginia. Monitor had heavier guns and cracked Virginia’s armor in several places, whereas Monitor suffered only dents, literally.

Ironclad warships were not new. The first ironclad ship of the line was the French La Gloire (1859), which looked like any other “broadside” warship of the period except that she was armored with wrought iron plates. The U.S. Navy had several lightly armored gunboats at the start of the Civil War, and these did great service in the rivers and bays of the South, running past heavily gunned forts which could do little to stop them because the solid shot of the guns bounced off their sloped armor.

When the Civil War started in 1861, the steam frigate USS Merrimack was laid up at Gosport (now Norfolk) Naval Base in Virginia needing her boilers serviced. The Federals were ordered to destroy everything and abandon the base, but in their haste to destroy the Merrimack they only burned her to the waterline, when she sank and put out the fire. The Confederates raised the hulk, repaired the boilers, renamed her CSS Virginia and set about creating a true juggernaut of an ironclad to try to break the Federal blockade at the mouth of the James and Elizabeth rivers in what is called Hampton Roads.

The Confederates built her as a ram, which was an obsolete technology that was coming back into vogue. Some of her armor was railway rails laid over thick oak timbers. She was so heavy and drew so much water that her top speed with her rickety boilers was just over 4 knots. She resembled a floating barn roof because her fore and after decks were almost awash. She was always in danger of going aground because of her deep draught, and because she was so underpowered she was nearly impossible to turn. But she mounted ten powerful guns, including 7-inch rifles bow and stern, and she had that ram which could easily sink any wooden warship even without the use of her firepower. Her sloped sides made solid shot simply bounce off her 4-inch armor. The Federals in their wooden ships had every reason to fear this behemoth, but at the same time it was no secret that the Confederates were building her, and president Lincoln called for designs for an ironclad of his own.

The man who came forward with the winning design was a Swedish American inventor named John Ericsson. His ship was unique. USS Monitor could be called a semi-submersible. She had only 14-inches of freeboard. Her decks were almost completely bare of everything except a tiny pilothouse forward (really just an armored viewport for the captain standing on the deck below), a short funnel for her steam engine, and her most distinctive feature, a revolving turret amidships housing two powerful 11-inch smoothbore Dahlgren guns. Because the deck was essentially bare the guns could be fired in virtually any direction without turning the whole ship, and because she was so low in the water there was virtually nothing for an enemy to shoot at except the turret. If you didn’t consider seaworthiness (which was nil), it was a marvelous design.

Despite a rushed building schedule, Monitor was late arriving in Hampton Roads. The day before Monitor's arrival, Virginia had already sortied on March 8, 1862, and despite her ponderous speed she had managed to sink or destroy two Federal wooden warships and damage a third before retiring, herself somewhat damaged but not seriously.

The next morning, March 9, 1962, Virginia again sortied to finish off the damaged Federal warship but was met by the USS Monitor, often described as a “cheesebox on a raft” because of her bizarre look. The two ships opened fire on each other and slugged it out for hours, but neither was able to do significant damage to the other. Virginia had broken off part of her ram in sinking the USS Cumberland the day before, and that put her at something of a disadvantage against Monitor which, had Virginia been able to ram, might have sunk her. But the probability of Virginia getting into position to ram Monitor would have been low anyway, since Monitor was lighter and more nimble. The fact is that Monitor literally ran rings around the slow, cumbersome Virginia. Despite this, Monitor was only able to crack or dislodge some of Virginia’s armor plates, while herself suffering only dents to the turret. Monitor was equipped with shutters to protect the gunners during reloading, but they quickly realized that it was simpler and faster to just revolve the turret away from the enemy, reload, then revolve the turret back and fire.

The noise within both warships must have been literally deafening. Finally a near miss at the pilothouse injured the eyes of the captain of the Monitor, which withdrew, but the Virginia had also had enough and withdrew as well. The epic battle was over in a draw. Neither ship ever fought another ship again. Virginia had to be destroyed when events on land forced the evacuation of Norfolk and her draught was too deep for her to flee, and Monitor sank off Cape Hatteras while being towed in a storm. Her low freeboard was her undoing.

The battle proved, of course, that wooden warships were instantly obsolete, and thereafter naval architects turned their attention to bigger and better ironclads, which eventually evolved into battleships, the heyday of which ended nearly a century later in WW2 when it was shown that even the biggest and most powerful battleships were no match for tiny airplanes equipped with armor piercing bombs and torpedoes. The Japanese Imperial Navy's Mushashi and Yamato, with their incredible 18-inch guns and thick armor, were sunk within months of each other by American aircraft in 1944 and 1945. Today’s modern missile cruisers and destroyers do not even bother with armor, except for a little Kevlar here and there as protection against flying splinters, relying instead on anti-ship missile and torpedo defense systems. No modern ship can outrun a plane, missile or torpedo, and heavy armor just slows a ship down and makes her less maneuverable. The day of the ironclad is over.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

It was our first naval battle that used many weapons that changed how we use naval ships and weapons. It was a battle between iron clad ships. Up to then, war ships were wooden with copper plating to protect it from damage by shells. These ships were covered with iron and many shells would bounce off their plating.
With the introduction of steam powered ironclad warships, the days of the wooden sailing ship were numbered. Tactics and, eventually, strategies changed to reflect the vessels' abilities to fire and maneuver.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

That's a question that's been debated ever since. In terms of ship-to-ship damage, it was about even.

The Monitor was able to get the Virginia to stop destroying the wooden ships of the US Navy in Chesapeake Bay, so perhaps it might be considered a strategic victory for the Union.

On four or five occasions after their first encounter the Rebels sailed the Virginia out into the Bay, trying to lure the Monitor into a rematch, but she would not come out from her safe anchorage under the guns of Fortress Monroe.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

At Hampton Roads, the CSS Virginia, formerly the USS Merrimac, was converted into a powerful ironclad. It was wreaking havoc and sunk or ser on fire several Union warships. If left unchecked the Union fear was that the CSS Virginia could sail to New York City and cause destruction and panic. The Union was in luck however. The new USS Monitor ironclad with a revolving turret reached Hampton Roads and the two ironclads fought to a draw. It was important because this was the first time in history that two ironclads met in battle. It brought on a new interest and production of ironclads. Also, because the USS Monitor arrived in Hampton Roads, it saved further damage to wooden Union warships.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who won the battle between the Virginia and the Monitor?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Who won the Battle of the Ironclads?

The Monitor won the "Battle of the Ironclads" between the Monitor and the Merrimack (Northern and Southern ships, respectively).


Who won in the Battle of Hampton Roads?

It was, in fact, not won by anyone. The two ironclads USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia (Merrimack) fought against each other for hours. The cannons would not pierce either ship and the battle ended in a draw.


Who won the war of Charleston?

the British won the Battle of Charleston south Carolina (in west Virginia. not badly but the British won.


What was the result of the naval battle between the USS Monitor and the Merrimack?

The first battle between two steam powered "ironclad" ships. Happened at Hampton Roads in Virginia. The Monitor was a Union ship. The Merrimack was a Confederate ship , but it was really named the "Virginia" (The ship was a Union ship named the Merrimack until it was captured by the Confederacy and renamed the Virginia). To add on to this the battle of the Monitor v. Merrimack: a vessel was created by the Confederates that was an ironclad warship, Lincoln ordered the same warship for the union. The warships were too advance for the weaponry thus both ships did little damage to each other. The significance of this battle was the fact that the ironclad warships changed the history of warfare. This was part of the Anaconda (that stated 1. Blockade the coast 2. Take the Mississippi thus splitting the South into two 3. Capture Richmond which was the seat of power/capital for the South and 4. Drive through the heart of Tennessee because it was the heart of the Confederacy) because the Union wanted to stop the Ironclad warship so it could not travel or import/export, plus it was threatening for the Union.


What was the outcome of the battle at sea between the union ship monitor and the confederate ship virgina?

That was the Battle of Hampton Roads. The battle is considered indescive because both sides claimed thay won and there is no easy way to determine who could be considered the victor looking back on it.

Related questions

What was significant about the battle between the Monitor and the Virginia?

AnswerIt was the first battle between ironclad warships.Monitor vs. Virginia (converted from the Merrimack)The battle between the Monitor and Virginia was important because it was the first naval battle where the ships involved used armored plating.


What was the outcome of the battle at sea between the union ship monitor and confederate ship Virginia?

Neither side won


. What was the outcome of the battle at sea between the Union ship Monitor and the Confederate ship Virginia?

Neither side won


What was the outcome of the battle of sea between the union ship monitor and the confederate ship Virginia?

Neither side won


Who won between the battle of the Merrimack and the Monitor?

The Merrimac,


Who won the battle of monitor and Virginia?

This battle, the first between ironclad warships, was a draw since neither ship could sufficiently damage the other. It took place in waters of Hampton Roads, Virginia, March 9, 1862.


Who won monitor battles the merrimac?

The fight between the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia (which you have called the Merrimac) was a draw (a tie).


Who won the battle between the monitor and the merrimack?

The Union Monitor and the Confederate Merrimack, renamed the Virginia, traded blows in Hampton Roads for several hours but neither was able to disable the other. Eventually both ships retreated to their bases, the Virginia more the worse for wear, and never met again.


Who won the Battle of the Ironclads?

The Monitor won the "Battle of the Ironclads" between the Monitor and the Merrimack (Northern and Southern ships, respectively).


Who won in the Battle of Hampton Roads?

It was, in fact, not won by anyone. The two ironclads USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia (Merrimack) fought against each other for hours. The cannons would not pierce either ship and the battle ended in a draw.


What was the result of the battle of monitor and the merrimac?

Lincoln won


Who won the battle in iron thunder merrimac or monitor?

No one really knows who won the battle. the Merrimac thinks they won and the Monitor thinks they won. its a matter of opinion! want to find out more? email me at : savannah5.cool@hotmail.com