Let the court regard only to one state, and States cannot nullify private contracts.
The case was important because it was the first time the US Supreme Court found a state law unconstitutional. This case was in 1810.
Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. 87 (1810), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision. It was the first case in which the Supreme Court ruled a state law unconstitutional. In the course of the westward push for the control of Indian lands, the state of Georgia took from the Indians a 35,000,000-acre (140,000 km2) region in the Yazoo River area known as the Yazoo Lands. This land later became the states of Alabama and Mississippi. In 1795 the Georgia legislature divided the area into four tracts. The state then sold the tracts to four separate land development companies for a modest total price of $500,000, i.e. about 1.4 cents per acre, a good deal even at 1790s prices. The Georgia legislature overwhelmingly approved this land grant, known as the Yazoo Land Act of 1795. The case grew out of the 1795 Georgia state legislature's sale of land in the Yazoo River country (in what is now Mississippi) under the Yazoo Land Act of 1795 to private speculators in return for bribes. Voters rejected most of the incumbents in the next election, and the next legislature, reacting to the public outcry, repealed the law and voided transactions made under it. John Peck had purchased land that had previously been sold under the 1795 act. Peck sold this land to Robert Fletcher and in 1803, Fletcher brought suit against Peck, claiming that he did not have clear title to the land when he sold it. The case reached the Supreme Court, which in a unanimous decision ruled that the state legislature's repeal of the law was unconstitutional. The opinion, written by John Marshall, argued that the sale was a binding contract, which according to Article I, Section 10, Clause I (the Contract Clause) of the Constitution cannot be invalidated, even if illegally secured. Today the ruling further protects property rights against popular pressures, and is the earliest case of the Court asserting its right to invalidate state laws conflicting with the Constitution.
When the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution almost 50 years later, one of the main parts of the First Amendment was government protection of freedom of the press. This action had its beginnings in the case of John Peter Zenger.
The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was over an issue of states' rights vs the rights of government. The state of Maryland wanted to tax the federal bank because they believed it was unconstitutional. However, the verdict of the case imposed the "necessary and proper" clause which gave the federal government power to make laws which weren't specified in the Constitution, but generally thought of as needed and lawful.
I guess it is a typo. It supposes to be Prefectural Government which, in the case of China, a level of government between Province and County. In Chinese, it is Diqu 地区. Hopefully this helps.
fletcher v. peck
The case was based on a corrupt land sale. John Peck bought the land originally and later sold some to Robert Fletcher with Peck having full knowledge that the sale of the land would be void under the current (1795) Georgia Law. This law was void and illegal based on the Contract Clause in the constitution that prevents any state from making and passing laws that would impair the obligations of contracts. The courts ruling was in Fletcher favor as the law was deemed unconstitutional
The case was important because it was the first time the US Supreme Court found a state law unconstitutional. This case was in 1810.
In the 1810 decision of the Marshall Court, Fletcher v. Peck, the Supreme Court ruled that a state law was unconstitutional. This established the Supreme Court's right to act in matters that concerned one state alone, and not one state versus another state or states.
The case Marbury vs. Madison in 1803 made this possible with the establishment of judicial review by Chief Justice John Marshall.
In Fletcher's case, NO!
The cast of The Fletcher Case - 1939 includes: Shelagh Furley Richard George Alec Mango Charles Paton Hazel Terry
It was that a law that negates all property rights established under an earlier law is unconstitutional by grounds of Article I, Section 10 in the Constitution which basically says "No law shall... pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts."
The court case Fletcher vs Peck was significant because it was the first court decision ruling a state law unconstitutional. The case related to the selling of lands purchased from natives without land titles.
nothing is for free
One landmark case in tort law is Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., where the court established the concept of proximate cause by ruling that individuals can only be held liable for harm that is reasonably foreseeable. This case helped shape the modern understanding of negligence and duty of care in tort law.
To protect the head in case of impact.