there was significant shuffling in the rulers and ruling methods of Renaissance government; this in turn, influenced the way residents gained authority and the process the economy ran on. Throughout the Medieval time period, most dignitaries were born into a slot on the authority hierarchy, a pecking order purely determined by the distinction of their earlier family members (e.g. father, grandfather); in the characteristic Renaissance leadership, this was different. Renaissance style government, such as in the Italian city of Venice, was different to Medieval feudal governing in the way that it was democratic, because of this, an unlawful 'doge' or governor could be easily voted out of office, this meant the leader had less supremacy, for, overuse of power could see him/her replaced. As the supremacy of the government regime began diminishing, peoples' dictation became more determined by occupation, guild membership or monopoly of trade. For families such as the 'Medici's, with the help of superior commerce, a deprived family was able to flourish, generating a Pope and 6 Queens. This would have been impossible in the Middle Ages, for profession had little influence on the feudal system. With the rise in Renaissance commerce, people began forming communal organizations. Communal organizations were assemblies of people, who joined together with the concept of monopolizing on each others abilities; these prosperous assemblies were some of the earliest types of firms, and were not seen in the medieval period.
After the West Roman Empire fell, in 476 AD, Rome itself was taken over by Ostrogoths, who were eventually thrown out by the army of the East Roman Empire. During this time, the government continued as it had been in at least some respects, and, in fact, the last recorded act of the Roman Senate took place in 603 AD. When the Roman Senate ceased to function, we do not know.
Rome was nominally under the control of the East Roman Empire, which had developed into the Byzantine Empire, until 752. Relations during this time were often uneasy, with the popes in control of Rome being defiant to the Emperor.
In 751, the Lombards threw the Byzantines out of the area around Rome, and the popes of the time sought protection from them by the Franks. The Papal States, ancestral to the present Vatican, were established in 752 with the Donation of Pepin, and their extent was codified in 781 by Charlemagne. After this point, the government of Rome was under control of the popes.
Kingdoms were the form of government during the Middle Ages
3 out of 3
I think that it changed because all the troubles they had during that time would probably change the government, but for the religion idk about it. (If you don't know what idk means, LOOK IT UP! Jk, it means i don't know... And jk stands for joking.. Just FYI - For your info-information!! I'm the info geek!
There was no middle class. This is a modern concept and only began to happen in the 1900's. White southerners who were well off lived very well.
The main thing that united people during the middle ages was their culture, government and wars. These were the factors that made the people of a particular community to stay united through the years.
The changes were taxes rose and people got mad.
Feudalism and feudal monarchies where the primary form of government during the middle ages.
How did the roar of the national government change during the war
Kingdoms were the form of government during the Middle Ages
because of me
Europe has never had a single government.
The concept of a wise fool developed during the Middle Ages.
yes
it changed by...................................
charway is such a cutie pie
representative government It was the first form of democratic government in the new world, and happened in Virginia during 1619.
the manor system