It didn't 'change the civil war'. It changed during the civil war. But only at the end - too late to make any difference.
After Lee was appointed General-in-Chief in January 1865, they made plans to train slaves for the army, and asked Britain and France whether they would grant recognition if slavery was abolished. They wouldn't.
Passing black codes.
they anything their leader Andrew Jacskon did. and he had numerous slaves and was a slaveholder.
It was a proclamation issued by Lincoln which freed all the slaves in states which were in rebellion (that is, the Confederate states during the Civil War). Lincoln threatened to free the slaves as a way to leverage the Confederacy into rejoining the Union. The Confederates refused. Lincoln followed through on his threat. Despite what many think, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all slaves, only those in states which had seceded. Slaves in other states had to wait until the adoption of the 13th Amendment before they received their freedom.
The Federal Government's powers are defined; other rights are reserved for the states and the people. People, includes local governments as well. The Framers wanted to ensure that the central governments powers were more clearly defined.
Yes, all republicans were against slavery whereas republicans accepted gradual change the radicals wanted immediate change.
No, the confederate had no slaves, but the union did have African American solders.
The Union is a group of states that disagree with slaves and the Confederate is a group of states that believe in slaves.
All slaves in the confederate states were free.
The idea of having slaves serve in the Confederate military as soldiers had been a topic in the South as early as 1863. I March of 1865, the Confederate Congress authorized the recruitment of slaves to serve as soldiers.
Lincoln
Confederate generals always had troops and slaves under their command.
Yes he did.
the Confederate constitution banned the importation of slaves into its states from outside countries, well before the US
The Emancipation Proclamation, however this was in name only, no slaves at all were freed as the Union had no control of Confederate territory and was unable to enforce it.
maybe No,because they thought the slaves would beat them,not the Union.
The confederate states think that there should no longer be slaves.
The new Confederacy's policy regarding slavery did not change from what it was when the Confederate States were part of the Union. Slaveholders had an investment in the slaves they "owned" in a manner of speaking. The slave owners would continue to supply food, clothing & shelter. They would not pay them any wages for their work.