0
Answer this question…
It promoted peace by preventing either country from attacking first because of the certainty of an immediate counterattack.
Kenny Donnelly
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the idea of mutually assured destruction affect the Cold War?
Answer this question… It promoted peace by preventing either country from attacking first because of the certainty of an immediate counterattack.
What is the idea of mutually assured destruction?
Mutually Assured Destruction is the concept that if someone attacks another they would respond by totally destroying the aggressor, but in the process of doing the destruction the original aggressor would be forced to totally destroy their original victim. Its acronym of MAD is very appropriate as it is mad to be the first aggressor as it would result in their own destruction. It is appropriate with respect to nuclear weapons as superpowers have enough of such weapons to totally destroy the others, and so none would start a nuclear war (to destroy someone) because the other side could/would respond in an equally destructive manner (destroying them).
Is mutually assured destruction based on the tit for tat game theory?
Yes. MAD is derived from the idea that when one side does something, the other side will attempt to do something at least as bad in return. Thus this escalating series of revenge will eventually destroy both sides.
How did the buildup of nuclear weapons promote peace during the cold war?
Answer this question… The idea of mutually assured destruction prevented the Soviet Union from launching a nuclear attack on the United States.
Did the policy of massive retaliation allow the use of nuclear weapons?
Think about it this way; you're President of the USA, and you've hear of the mutally assured destruction. If you want to destroy your country along with another one, the use your weapons against another country. That is the idea of mutually assured destruction. There has not been one bomb dropped onto any other country since 1945; Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Tests have been carried out many times since then, especially during the Cold War. But there has been no nuclear explosions know to the public since then. Nicolas Dupont
How did the idea of mutually assured destruction affect the Cold War?
Answer this question… It promoted peace by preventing either country from attacking first because of the certainty of an immediate counterattack.
How did the buildup of nuclear weapons promote during the Cold War?
Answer this question… The idea of mutually assured destruction prevented the Soviet Union from launching a nuclear attack on the United States.
What idea of mutually assured destruction?
If you bomb us we'll bomb you so nobody wins
What is the idea of mutually assured destruction?
Mutually Assured Destruction is the concept that if someone attacks another they would respond by totally destroying the aggressor, but in the process of doing the destruction the original aggressor would be forced to totally destroy their original victim. Its acronym of MAD is very appropriate as it is mad to be the first aggressor as it would result in their own destruction. It is appropriate with respect to nuclear weapons as superpowers have enough of such weapons to totally destroy the others, and so none would start a nuclear war (to destroy someone) because the other side could/would respond in an equally destructive manner (destroying them).
The idea that the destruction of one species in a community could greatly affect other members of the community has its roots in the hypothesis of community structure proposed by?
Clements
Is mutually assured destruction based on the tit for tat game theory?
Yes. MAD is derived from the idea that when one side does something, the other side will attempt to do something at least as bad in return. Thus this escalating series of revenge will eventually destroy both sides.
How did the buildup of nuclear weapons promote peace during the cold war?
Answer this question… The idea of mutually assured destruction prevented the Soviet Union from launching a nuclear attack on the United States.
What was the nuclear deterence strategy where the response to a missile attack is so huge that the attacking nation is destroyed?
I think the term you are looking for is Mutually Assured Destruction or deterrence but I'll list some other cold war/nuclear war termonolgy that you might find useful as well. -Brinkmanship: The idea that one never backs down causing the other side to back down first. -Massive Retaliation: This was an American ideal that if America got attacked they would retaliate with massive amounts of bombs. -Mutual Deterence: Its the idea that your country has enough nuclear weapons to defeat the opposing country, and this should act as a deterrence against them acting you. -MAD (Mutually Assure Destruction): A theory that two countries could use its ability to launch a nuclear counterattack to stop the other side from striking. As a result, both side's counties are blown apart.
Did the policy of massive retaliation allow the use of nuclear weapons?
Think about it this way; you're President of the USA, and you've hear of the mutally assured destruction. If you want to destroy your country along with another one, the use your weapons against another country. That is the idea of mutually assured destruction. There has not been one bomb dropped onto any other country since 1945; Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Tests have been carried out many times since then, especially during the Cold War. But there has been no nuclear explosions know to the public since then. Nicolas Dupont
What meant the US would punish the USSR with an all out nuclear attack if they launched a nuclear attack?
This meant that if the Soviets had attacked the US with nuclear-based weapons, the US would not be hesitant to retaliate and strike back with their own nuclear bombs. This idea is what characterises the Cold War, because if one power struck another power with similar capabilities (using such devastating weaponry), then it would mean mutually assured destruction for all participants.
Who had the idea of the wooden horse that brought destruction to Troy?
Odysseus
Why is the Russian army not launching they're missiles at the usa yet?
Well, a number of reasons, but first and foremost is that we have missiles too, you know? And if missiles get launched at us, our missiles get launched back. During the Cold War, the idea behind building arsenals of such missiles was actually notto use them - it's called nuclear deterrence, the idea being that the Soviet Union and United States would refrain from launching nuclear warheads at each other, for the simple reason that they could expect the same in return, in a policy often referred to as the Mutually Assured Destruction policy.
