The existence of God or other supernatural deity has yet to be proven nor disproven. In effect, it is up to the individual to determine where his or her faith lies. However, in retrospect, the invention and use of the microscope to discover micro-organisms and cells has more or less supported the theory of biological evolution over intelligent design because the discovery of cells contends that all life on Earth has developed from such.
Answer:
1) The microscope quickly demonstrated the bottomless, infinite wisdom and complexity which is found in living things. The inner workings of a single cell are much more complex than a whole skyscrpare with all its wiring, Plumbing, elevators, etc. Believers see this as an undeniable indication of God.
2) THe microscope showed another example of irreducible complexity: you can't have DNA, or organelles, without DNA to form it. Believers see this as an indication that God must have started it all.
The microscope itself does not directly prove or disprove the existence of God. It is a scientific tool that allows us to observe and study the intricacies of the natural world. Whether or not one interprets these observations as evidence of a divine creator is a matter of personal belief and faith.
there are none... it's called faith
No definitely not. He is famous for attempting to prove Gods existence through his ontological arguments.
Albert Einstein was the first person to ever be able to show a way to prove the existence of atoms. He did this by using a simple microscope.
A:All gods are real to those who believe in them. All gods are fake to those who do not believe. And all gods - the Christian God, the Hindu gods, the Chinese gods and so on - share one thing in common. We can not absolutely prove their non-existence; we can only say that they are most unlikely to be real.
the existence of released energy
Without the invention of the microscope, cells would either not ever been discovered or would have been discovered much later. This is because microscopes are the only way to see cells, and thus are the only way to prove their existence
All religions are equally good - or equally unable - at proving the existence of their god(s) of choice.
How do you proof of the existence of back emf ?
Buddhism is non-theistic. It neither needs or recognizes gods as agents of answering prayers, helping or hindering mankind or being judges of human behaviour. The need to prove or disprove the existence of gods is unimportant
No. Any person trained in logic will tell you that 'you cannot prove a negative'. If you want to disprove the existence of fairies you first attempt to try and prove their existence. And the best you can do is to fail to prove it. The option to prove it always exists.
No. But then can you prove that you do?
They have faith.